Naylor v. State
332 S.W.3d 923, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 251, 2011 WL 692846
Opinion
ORDER
Arlando M. Naylor (Movant) appeals from the judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 24.085 without an evidentiary hearing. The motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value and we affirm by written order. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Naylor v. State, 332 S.W.3d 923, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 251, 2011 WL 692846 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).
332 S.W.3d 923 (Naylor v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Dace v. Dace
332 S.W.3d 923 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)