Dace v. Dace

332 S.W.3d 923, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 252, 2011 WL 692819
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 1, 2011·No. ED 95066·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Catherine Dace (Wife) appeals the circuit court’s judgment denying her motion for relief from judgment in her divorce from Ronald Dace (Husband).

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dace v. Dace, 332 S.W.3d 923, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 252, 2011 WL 692819 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

332 S.W.3d 923 (Dace v. Dace) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Naylor v. State
332 S.W.3d 923 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)