Navarro v. Derbes

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Navarro v. Derbes

30 So. 2d 126, 211 La. 384, 1947 La. LEXIS 766

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedMarch 17, 1947

DocketNo. 38454.

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 30 So. 2d 126 (Navarro v. Derbes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Navarro v. Derbes, 30 So. 2d 126, 211 La. 384, 1947 La. LEXIS 766 (La. 1947).

Pincite

Opinion

FOURNET, Justice.

Counsel for the appellees, representing the widow and heirs of the late Charles J. Derbes, one of the parties defendant in the above entitled case, has moved that the appeal taken from the judgment of the lower court dismissing the suit of the plaintiffs be dismissed as to them for the reason that the said Charles J. Derbes died on October 11, 1946, prior to the rendition of the judgment in the matter on October 14 and its signing by the trial judge on October 22.

Although the proceedings in the district court were valid up to the moment of Mr. Derbes’s death, at that instant the action abated as to him (Cambon Bros. v. Suthon, 148 La. 669, 87 So. 512; West v. Green, 10 La.App. 707, 122 So. 128) and all proceedings taken thereafter without his legal representatives having been made parties were absolute nullities (Bates v. Weathers by, 2 La.Ann. 484; Succession of Pickett, 41 La.Ann. 882, 6 So. 655; Atkins v. Smith, 204 La. 468, 15 So.2d 855), subject to attack at any time. Edwards v. Whited, 29 La. Ann. 647.

The request of the plaintiff-appellants that the appeal instead of being dismissed be remanded in order to make certain minor heirs “parties Defendant in accordance with law,” would avail them nothing in the instant case for the reason that the judgment rendered in the case as to Derbes and the order of appeal therefrom are, on their face, absolute nullities, and the fact that pursuant to the motion for the appeal the heirs were caused to be served with a copy of the order of appeal and cited to answer the same does not cure the absolute nullity of the judgment rendered affecting a dead person. The appeal from such judgment was not only improvidently granted, but is without effect.

*388 For the reasons assigned the appeal is dismissed in so far as it affects Charles J. Derbes, deceased, his widow, heirs, or legal representatives.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FOURNET, Justice.

Counsel for the appellees, representing the widow and heirs of the late Charles J. Derbes, one of the parties defendant in the above entitled case, has moved that the appeal taken from the judgment of the lower court dismissing the suit of the plaintiffs be dismissed as to them for the reason that the said Charles J. Derbes died on October 11, 1946, prior to the rendition of the judgment in the matter on October 14 and its signing by the trial judge on October 22.

Although the proceedings in the district court were valid up to the moment of Mr. Derbes’s death, at that instant the action abated as to him (Cambon Bros. v. Suthon, 148 La. 669, 87 So. 512; West v. Green, 10 La.App. 707, 122 So. 128) and all proceedings taken thereafter without his legal representatives having been made parties were absolute nullities (Bates v. Weathers by, 2 La.Ann. 484; Succession of Pickett, 41 La.Ann. 882, 6 So. 655; Atkins v. Smith, 204 La. 468, 15 So.2d 855), subject to attack at any time. Edwards v. Whited, 29 La. Ann. 647.

The request of the plaintiff-appellants that the appeal instead of being dismissed be remanded in order to make certain minor heirs “parties Defendant in accordance with law,” would avail them nothing in the instant case for the reason that the judgment rendered in the case as to Derbes and the order of appeal therefrom are, on their face, absolute nullities, and the fact that pursuant to the motion for the appeal the heirs were caused to be served with a copy of the order of appeal and cited to answer the same does not cure the absolute nullity of the judgment rendered affecting a dead person. The appeal from such judgment was not only improvidently granted, but is without effect.

*388 For the reasons assigned the appeal is dismissed in so far as it affects Charles J. Derbes, deceased, his widow, heirs, or legal representatives.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

30 So. 2d 126, 211 La. 384, 1947 La. LEXIS 766, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/navarro-v-derbes-la-1947.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack