Bates v. Weathersby

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Bates v. Weathersby

2 La. Ann. 484

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedApril 15, 1847

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 2 La. Ann. 484 (Bates v. Weathersby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bates v. Weathersby, 2 La. Ann. 484 (La. 1847).

Pincite

Opinion

The judgment of the court was pronounced by

King, J.

The appellees have moved to dismiss this appeal, on 1he ground that it was granted while another was pending in the same cause, which has since been abandoned, and because all the parties to the suit in the pourt below have not been made parties to the appeal.

In the first petition presented for an appeal, the appellants omitted to make several of the defendants parties. Upon discovering this error a second petition was presented, which embraced all the parties, and on this a second order of appeal was granted. The clerk prepared and sent up a transcript under ■each order. By ,an agreementof counsel on file the first appeal was dismissed. It was irregularly taken, and the inferior court had not, by the first order given, divested itself of jurisdiction of the eause, but still retained full authority to grant a second order, which would be available to the parties, and enable them to be heard in this court.

The fact relied on in support of the second ground, does not, in our opinion, authorise the dismissal of the appeal, but requires that the cause be remanded, During the pendency of the action in the court below, one of the parties, Lodwick L. Weathersby died. No notice appears to have been taken of the fact, and the cause was tried and decided without citing his heirs, who have neither been made parties to the proceedings below., nor to this appeal. This is clearly irregular. The suit is for a partition, and the validity of certain testamentary dispositions are brought in question. The interests of the heirs of the deceased must necessarily be affected by the result, and no final judgment can be rendered until they are made parties. 3 La. 524, 442. C. P. art. 120.

It is therefore ordered that the judgment of the court below be reversed, .and that the cause be remanded, with instructions to the judge not to proceed ■to trial until the heirs of Lodwick L. Weathersby be made parties to the suit; the appellees paying the .costs of this appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The judgment of the court was pronounced by

King, J.

The appellees have moved to dismiss this appeal, on 1he ground that it was granted while another was pending in the same cause, which has since been abandoned, and because all the parties to the suit in the pourt below have not been made parties to the appeal.

In the first petition presented for an appeal, the appellants omitted to make several of the defendants parties. Upon discovering this error a second petition was presented, which embraced all the parties, and on this a second order of appeal was granted. The clerk prepared and sent up a transcript under ■each order. By ,an agreementof counsel on file the first appeal was dismissed. It was irregularly taken, and the inferior court had not, by the first order given, divested itself of jurisdiction of the eause, but still retained full authority to grant a second order, which would be available to the parties, and enable them to be heard in this court.

The fact relied on in support of the second ground, does not, in our opinion, authorise the dismissal of the appeal, but requires that the cause be remanded, During the pendency of the action in the court below, one of the parties, Lodwick L. Weathersby died. No notice appears to have been taken of the fact, and the cause was tried and decided without citing his heirs, who have neither been made parties to the proceedings below., nor to this appeal. This is clearly irregular. The suit is for a partition, and the validity of certain testamentary dispositions are brought in question. The interests of the heirs of the deceased must necessarily be affected by the result, and no final judgment can be rendered until they are made parties. 3 La. 524, 442. C. P. art. 120.

It is therefore ordered that the judgment of the court below be reversed, .and that the cause be remanded, with instructions to the judge not to proceed ■to trial until the heirs of Lodwick L. Weathersby be made parties to the suit; the appellees paying the .costs of this appeal.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 La. Ann. 484, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bates-v-weathersby-la-1847.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack