Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America v. D. D. Harrington, D. D. Harrington v. Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America
Opinion
Leave to file a second petition for rehearing is denied. Natural Gas Co. of America v. Panoma Corp., 349 U.S. 44, 75 S.Ct. 576, 99 L.Ed. 683. The notation of Mr. Justice Douglas’ dissent shows that the Court considered the question presented by this second petition for rehearing. See also the recent per curiam opinions of the Supreme Court in Cities Service Gas Co. v. State Corporation Commission of Kansas, No. 85, 78 S.Ct. 381; and in Michigan Wisconsin Pipe Line Co. v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma, No. 86, 78 S.Ct. 409; Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma, No. 111, 78 S.Ct. 409; Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma, No. 112, 78 S.Ct. 409; Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma, No. 113, 78 S.Ct. 410.
Leave to file
Denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
253 F.2d 231 (Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America v. D. D. Harrington, D. D. Harrington v. Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.