NATIONWIDE MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY v. Bridges

Court of Appeals of Georgia

NATIONWIDE MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY v. Bridges

230 S.E.2d 491, 140 Ga. App. 242, 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 1424

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedOctober 4, 1976

Docket52594

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 230 S.E.2d 491 (NATIONWIDE MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY v. Bridges) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

NATIONWIDE MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY v. Bridges, 230 S.E.2d 491, 140 Ga. App. 242, 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 1424 (Ga. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinions

Quillian, Judge.

The defendant appeals from the grant of plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability. The plaintiff sought recovery on a fire insurance policy with the defendant insurance company which contended that it was not liable because the policy had been canceled before the loss occurred in February, 1975.

As set forth in the trial judge’s order: "The undisputed facts show that defendant issued Policy No. 61MP 128-781 on October 1, 1974. This policy was canceled on October 28, 1974, without any effort of the defendant to comply with Code Ann. § 56-2430. Defendant substituted for the aforesaid policy another fire insurance policy No. 61MP 128-744, without notice to the plaintiff of the substitution. Thereafter, and on December 9, 1974, the defendant notified the plaintiff that Policy No. 61MP 128-744 (the substituted policy) would be canceled on the 10th day after receipt of the notice.” The plaintiff testified that when he made inquiry he was told by defendant’s agent that a mistake had been made and the original policy was still in force. Held:

[243]*243Argued September 14,1976 Decided October 4, 1976 Rehearing denied October 28, 1976 Levine, D’Alessio & Cohn, Sam F. Lowe, Jr., Sam F. Lowe, III, for appellant. Thomas F. Jones, for appellee.

Upon thorough consideration of the record we agree with the ruling of the trial court that plaintiff was entitled to a summary judgment on the issue of liability. There was no cancellation of the original policy. See Ga. Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co. v. Gordon, 126 Ga. App. 215 (1) (190 SE2d 447); Republic Ins. Co. v. Cook, 129 Ga. App. 833 (1) (201 SE2d 668); Motors Ins. Corp. v. Roper, 136 Ga. App. 224, 225 (221 SE2d 55). Hence, the cancellation of another purported policy was of no effect.

Judgment affirmed.

Deen, P. J., and Webb, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Quillian, Judge.

The defendant appeals from the grant of plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability. The plaintiff sought recovery on a fire insurance policy with the defendant insurance company which contended that it was not liable because the policy had been canceled before the loss occurred in February, 1975.

As set forth in the trial judge’s order: "The undisputed facts show that defendant issued Policy No. 61MP 128-781 on October 1, 1974. This policy was canceled on October 28, 1974, without any effort of the defendant to comply with Code Ann. § 56-2430. Defendant substituted for the aforesaid policy another fire insurance policy No. 61MP 128-744, without notice to the plaintiff of the substitution. Thereafter, and on December 9, 1974, the defendant notified the plaintiff that Policy No. 61MP 128-744 (the substituted policy) would be canceled on the 10th day after receipt of the notice.” The plaintiff testified that when he made inquiry he was told by defendant’s agent that a mistake had been made and the original policy was still in force. Held:

[243]*243Argued September 14,1976 Decided October 4, 1976 Rehearing denied October 28, 1976 Levine, D’Alessio & Cohn, Sam F. Lowe, Jr., Sam F. Lowe, III, for appellant. Thomas F. Jones, for appellee.

Upon thorough consideration of the record we agree with the ruling of the trial court that plaintiff was entitled to a summary judgment on the issue of liability. There was no cancellation of the original policy. See Ga. Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co. v. Gordon, 126 Ga. App. 215 (1) (190 SE2d 447); Republic Ins. Co. v. Cook, 129 Ga. App. 833 (1) (201 SE2d 668); Motors Ins. Corp. v. Roper, 136 Ga. App. 224, 225 (221 SE2d 55). Hence, the cancellation of another purported policy was of no effect.

Judgment affirmed.

Deen, P. J., and Webb, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

230 S.E.2d 491, 140 Ga. App. 242, 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 1424, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nationwide-mutual-fire-insurance-company-v-bridges-gactapp-1976.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack