Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. Hatch

717 So. 2d 71, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 8139, 1998 WL 377792
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 9, 1998·No. No. 98-579·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The county court found, as a matter of fact, that petitioner waived its right to compel arbitration by engaging in discovery. See, e.g., Coral 97 Associates, Ltd. v. Chino Electric, Inc., 501 So.2d 69 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987). On appeal to the circuit court, petitioner failed to challenge the adequacy of the factual basis for the county court’s finding of waiver. We cannot say that the circuit court, acting in its review capacity, failed to afford petitioner procedural due process or failed to apply the correct law. Therefore, the petition for certiorari is DENIED. See Haines City Community Development v. Heggs, 658 So.2d 523 (Fla.1995).

BARFIELD, C.J., and JOANOS and KAHN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. Hatch, 717 So. 2d 71, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 8139, 1998 WL 377792 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

717 So. 2d 71 (Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. Hatch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Haines City Community Dev. v. Heggs
658 So. 2d 523 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1995)
CORAL 97 ASSOCIATES v. Chino Elec., Inc.
501 So. 2d 69 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)