Nationstar Mtge. LLC v. Ahmed

2021 NY Slip Op 03259
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 20, 2021
DocketIndex No. 381238/08 Appeal No. 13867 Case No. 2020-03505
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2021 NY Slip Op 03259 (Nationstar Mtge. LLC v. Ahmed) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nationstar Mtge. LLC v. Ahmed, 2021 NY Slip Op 03259 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

Nationstar Mtge. LLC v Ahmed (2021 NY Slip Op 03259)
Nationstar Mtge. LLC v Ahmed
2021 NY Slip Op 03259
Decided on May 20, 2021
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: May 20, 2021
Before: Acosta, P.J., Webber, Kennedy, Shulman, JJ.

Index No. 381238/08 Appeal No. 13867 Case No. 2020-03505

[*1]Nationstar Mortgage LLC, Plaintiff-Respondent,

v

Ferhana Ahmed, Defendant-Appellant, City of New York Environmental Control Board et al., Defendants.


The Rosenfeld Law Office, Lawrence (Avi Rosenfeld of counsel), for appellant.

McCalla Raymer Leibert Pierce, LLC, New York (Jane H. Torcia of counsel), for respondent.



Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, Bronx County (Doris M. Gonzalez, J.), entered November 25, 2019, which granted plaintiff Nationstar Mortgage LLC's (Nationstar) motion for judgment of foreclosure and sale, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

To have a late answer deemed timely served nunc pro tunc, and avoid the entry of a default judgment, a nonanswering defendant is required to provide a reasonable excuse for the delay in answering and demonstrate a potentially meritorious defense to the action (see CPLR 5015[a][1]), which defendant Ahmed failed to do.

Were defendant's arguments raised in opposition to plaintiff's motion for a

judgment of foreclosure and sale to be considered, such arguments would be unavailing.THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: May 20, 2021



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nationstar Mtge. LLC v. Ahmed
2021 NY Slip Op 03259 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2021 NY Slip Op 03259, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nationstar-mtge-llc-v-ahmed-nyappdiv-2021.