Nationstar Mortgage, LLC v. Summers
198 So. 3d 1162, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 13578, 2016 WL 4734312
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 9, 2016·No. No. 1D15-4794·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
We reverse the final summary judgment entered in favor of Appellees, and remand for reinstatement of the foreclosure action and proceedings on the merits. See Brindise v. U.S. Bank, N.A, 183 So.3d 1215 (Fla. 2d DCA), review denied, 2016 WL 1122325, at *1- (Fla.2016) (rejecting borrowers’ argumént that the notice requirement of section 559.715 of the Florida Statutes applies in foreclosure actions); McCall v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A., 186 So.3d 1134 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016) (affirming judgment for lender on authority of Bnn-dise).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Nationstar Mortgage, LLC v. Summers, 198 So. 3d 1162, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 13578, 2016 WL 4734312 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).
198 So. 3d 1162 (Nationstar Mortgage, LLC v. Summers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Dyck-O'Neal, Inc. v. Heather Lanham
264 So. 3d 1115 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2019)
Peters v. The Bank of New York Mellon
227 So. 3d 175 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)