McCall v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A.

186 So. 3d 1134, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 4142, 2016 WL 1077352

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 17, 2016·No. No. 1D15-566·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We grant Appellant's motion for rehearing, withdraw our previous per curiam af-firmance, and substitute the following in its place.

AFFIRMED. See Brindise v. U.S. Bank Nat’l Ass’n, 183 So.3d 1216 (Jan. 2016).

SWANSON, MAKAR, and BILBREY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McCall v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A., 186 So. 3d 1134, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 4142, 2016 WL 1077352 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

186 So. 3d 1134 (McCall v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.