Nations Bank N.A. South v. Millington Homes Investors, LTD.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee·Decided February 19, 1999·No. 02A01-9805-CH-00134·Published

Opinion

IN T H E C O U R T O F A P P E A L S O F T E N N E S S E E A T JA C K S O N J A N U A R Y 1 9 9 9 S E S S IO N ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

N A T I O N S B A N K , N .A . ( S O U T H ) , ) S h e lb y C h a n c e ry N o . 1 0 9 8 8 2 2 -3 ) P la in tiff /A p p e lle e ) A p p e al N o . 0 2 A 0 1 -9 8 0 5 -C H - 0 0 1 3 4 )

F LED I v . ) ) M IL L IN G T O N H O M E S ) I N V E S T O R S , L T D ., ) F e b ru a ry 1 9 , 1 9 9 9 ) D e fe n d a n t / A p p e ll a n t ) C e c il C r o w s o n , J r . A p p e lla te C o u r t C le r k

A P P E A L F R O M T H E C H A N C E R Y C O U R T O F S H E L B Y C O U N T Y A T M E M P H IS , T E N N E S S E E T H E H O N O R A B L E D . J. A L L IS A N D R A T O S , C H A N C E L L O R

F o r th e A p p e lla n t: R . G r a tta n B r o w n , J r ., L a rry H . M o n tg o m e ry , a n d C h a r le s W e s le y F o w le r , G L A N K L E R B R O W N , P L L C O n e C o m m e rc e S q u a re , S te . 1 7 0 0 M e m p h is , T N 3 8 1 0 3

F o r t h e A p p e lle e : P h ilip D . Irw in N E A L & H A R W E L L , P L C 2 0 0 0 F irs t U n io n T o w e r 1 5 0 F o u rth A v e n u e N o rth N a sh v ille , T N 3 7 2 1 9

A F F IR M E D

W IL L IA M H . IN M A N , S e n io r J u d g e C O N C U R :

W . F R A N K C R A W F O R D , J u d g e D A V ID R . F A R M E R , J u d g e

T h i s is a n a c t i o n to c o l l e c t 3 2 p r o m i s s o r y n o te s e x e c u te d b y th e d e f e n d a n t

in 1 9 8 5 , 1 9 8 6 , a n d 1 9 8 7 p a y a b le to U S A F a irf ie ld R e a lty F u n d , L T D . a n d a s sig n e d

to C itiz e n s F e d e r a l B a n k , N .A ., o n o rd e r, o n D e c e m b e r 2 0 , 1 9 9 1 , w ith o u t r e c o u r s e .

A p p e n d ix A i s a d i a g r a m m a t i c e x p l a n a t i o n o f t h e c o m m e r c i a l l i n e a g e o f th e

d e fe n d a n t.

T h e s e e n t itie s a re in v e s tm e n t v e h ic le s w h o s e p a r e n t c o m p a n y , U S A

P r o p e r t i e s F u n d , I n c ., 1 e x c l u s i v e l y m a n a g e d t h e b u s i n e s s a f f a i r s o f M i l l i n g t o n

H o m e s , a n a p a r t m e n t c o m p l e x lo c a t e d in t h e C i t y o f M i l l i n g t o n w h o s e g o v e r n i n g

b o d y c h a n g e d th e z o n i n g d e s i g n a ti o n f r o m r e s i d e n ti a l t o i n d u s t r i a l w h i c h , w h e n

fin a liz e d , w o u ld h a v e trig g e re d fo re c lo s u re o f th e fe d e ra l fin a n c in g m o r tg a g e s .

T h i s lo o m in g p r o b le m g a v e im p e tu s to a s a le o f th e a p a r t m e n t s t o t h e C i t y o f

M i l l i n g t o n . T h e p la in t i f f b a n k , a n a l l e g e d u n s e c u r e d c r e d it o r o f t h e d e fe n d a n t b y

v i r t u e o f it s a s s e r te d o w n e r s h i p o f t h e p r o m i s s o r y n o t e s , f i le d t h i s a c t io n t o r e c o v e r

t h e p r o c e e d s o f t h e n o te s .2 T h e d e f e n d a n t p l e a d e d (1 ) t h e b a r o f t h e S t a t u t e o f

L i m i t a t i o n s , T .C .A . § 2 8 - 3 - 1 0 9 ( c ) f o r a ll n o te s d a te d b e f o r e J a n u a r y 1 4 , 1 9 8 7 ; ( 2 )

e s t o p p e l, a l l e g i n g t h a t t h e p l a i n t i f f “ r e p r e s e n t e d t o d e fe n d a n t t h a t i t w o u l d a c c e p t

a l e s s e r a m o u n t i n s a t is f a c t i o n o f th e n o t e s ; ( 3 ) a g e n e r a l d e n i a l o f th e a l l e g a t io n s .

1 Edward Herzog is an officer and/or an agent for all but one (USA Millington Homes, Ltd.) of these commercial entities: 1. USA Fairfield; 2. Vice-President of (Defendant/Appellant) Millington Homes Investors, Ltd.; 3. Vice-President of USA Properties Fund, Inc., and authorized signatory on behalf of USA Fairfield; 4. Vice-President of Finance for (Defendant/Appellant) Millington Homes Investors, Ltd.; 5. Vice-President of USA Millington Homes, Inc.; 6. Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer of USA Properties Fund, Inc. 2 Both its 75% interest, and, as agent, the remaining 25%. The total amount attached was circa $800,000.

2 T o t h e p le a d i n g o f t h e d e f e n d a n t o f e s t o p p e l, t h e p la in t i f f r e li e d u p o n th e S t a t u t e

o f F r a u d s , T .C .A . § 2 9 -2 - 1 0 1 ( b ) ( 1 ) .

T h e m o ti o n o f t h e p la in ti f f f o r s u m m a ry ju d g m e n t w a s g r a n te d u p o n a

fin d in g b y t h e C h a n c e l lo r t h a t th e a c t io n w a s ( 1 ) n o t ti m e - b a r r e d , a n d ( 2 )

n o t w i t h s t a n d in g t h a t a d is p u t e e x i s t e d a s t o w h e th e r t h e p l a i n t i f f o r a l l y a g r e e d t o

a c c e p t a le s s e r s u m t h a n w a s o w i n g o n t h e n o t e s , s u c h d i s p u t e d id n o t i n v o lv e a

m a te ria l is su e b e c a u s e th e a lle g e d p r o m is e w a s n e v e r re d u c e d to w ritin g . T h e

d e fe n d a n t a p p e a ls , a n d p r e se n ts fo r re v ie w tw o is su e s w h ic h w e re p r o d u c e in h a e c

ve rb a :

I. W h e th e r t h e t r ia l c o u r t e r r e d i n r u l in g t h a t N a t io n s B a n k ’ s a g r e e m e n t to a c c e p t a le s s e r s u m in s a tis fa c tio n o f M illin g to n H o m e s ’ lia b ility , a n d N a tio n s B a n k ’s a g re e m e n t to p u t th a t a g r e e m e n t i n w r i t i n g , a re b a r r e d b y th e S ta tu te o f F r a u d s p r o v id e d b y T .C .A . § 2 9 -2 - 1 0 1 ( b ) ( 1 ) .

II. W h e th e r t h e t r i a l c o u r t e r r e d i n r u l i n g t h a t t h e S t a t u t e o f L im ita tio n s p r o v id e d b y T .C .A . § 2 8 -3 - 1 0 9 ( c ) d id n o t b a r a n y o f N a t io n s B a n k ’ s c la i m s .3

W e s h a ll re s ta te in c o n te x t th e id e n tity a n d p o s tu re o f th e e n t it ie s w h o a r e

d ire c tly o r p e rip h e ra lly in v o lv e d in th is litig a tio n .

T h e d e f e n d a n t , M i l l i n g t o n H o m e s , i s a T e n n e s s e e l im i t e d p a r tn e r s h i p w h o s e

g e n e ra l p a rtn e r is U S A M illin g to n H o m e s L T D . U S A M illin g to n H o m e s L T D is

a T e n n e s se e lim ite d p a rtn e rs h ip w h o s e g e n e ra l p a rtn e r is U S A M illin g to n H o m e s ,

In c . U S A M i l l i n g t o n H o m e s , I n c ., i s a T e n n e s s e e c o r p o r a ti o n w h o s e s to c k i s

o w n e d b y U S A P r o p e rtie s F u n d , In c .

In 1 9 8 4 , U S A P r o p e r t i e s F u n d , I n c ., e n te r e d in t o a j o i n t v e n t u r e w i t h

E q u it a b le S e r v i c e s C o r p o r a t i o n ( “ E q u i t a b l e ” ) , a s u b s i d i a r y o f C i t i z e n s F e d e r a l

3 At the outset, we note that some arguments of the defendant, such as its insistence that the plaintiff did not own the notes when suit was filed, are not the subject of an issue presented for review. Accordingly, we will confine our discussion of the case to the issues presented.

3 S a v in g s & L o a n A s so c ia tio n , la te r k n o w n a s C itiz e n s F e d e r a l B a n k (“ C itiz e n s ” ).

T h e jo i n t v e n tu r e w a s n a m e d U S A / F a ir f i e ld R e a l t y F u n d L T D ( “ U S A F a i r f ie l d ” ) .

U S A P r o p e r tie s F u n d , In c ., w a s th e g e n e r a l p a r tn e r o f U S A F a ir f ie ld , a n d

E q u i ta b l e w a s i t s s o l e l i m i te d p a r t n e r .

O n D ecem b er 3 , 1 99 1 , U S A F a irfie ld , U S A P r o p e rtie s F u n d , In c . a n d

E q u it a b le e n t e r e d i n t o a n a g re e m e n t w h e re b y E q u it a b le w o u ld tr a n s f e r 3 .6 5 % o f

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nations Bank N.A. South v. Millington Homes Investors, LTD., (Tenn. Ct. App. 1999).

Nations Bank N.A. South v. Millington Homes Investors, LTD. (Nations Bank N.A. South v. Millington Homes Investors, LTD.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Union Carbide Corp. v. Huddleston
854 S.W.2d 87 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1993)
Campbell v. Florida Steel Corp.
919 S.W.2d 26 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1996)