Nations Bank N.A. South v. Millington Homes Investors, LTD.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Tennessee
DecidedFebruary 19, 1999
Docket02A01-9805-CH-00134
StatusPublished

This text of Nations Bank N.A. South v. Millington Homes Investors, LTD. (Nations Bank N.A. South v. Millington Homes Investors, LTD.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nations Bank N.A. South v. Millington Homes Investors, LTD., (Tenn. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

IN T H E C O U R T O F A P P E A L S O F T E N N E S S E E A T JA C K S O N J A N U A R Y 1 9 9 9 S E S S IO N ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

N A T I O N S B A N K , N .A . ( S O U T H ) , ) S h e lb y C h a n c e ry N o . 1 0 9 8 8 2 2 -3 ) P la in tiff /A p p e lle e ) A p p e al N o . 0 2 A 0 1 -9 8 0 5 -C H - 0 0 1 3 4 )

F LED I v . ) ) M IL L IN G T O N H O M E S ) I N V E S T O R S , L T D ., ) F e b ru a ry 1 9 , 1 9 9 9 ) D e fe n d a n t / A p p e ll a n t ) C e c il C r o w s o n , J r . A p p e lla te C o u r t C le r k

A P P E A L F R O M T H E C H A N C E R Y C O U R T O F S H E L B Y C O U N T Y A T M E M P H IS , T E N N E S S E E T H E H O N O R A B L E D . J. A L L IS A N D R A T O S , C H A N C E L L O R

F o r th e A p p e lla n t: R . G r a tta n B r o w n , J r ., L a rry H . M o n tg o m e ry , a n d C h a r le s W e s le y F o w le r , G L A N K L E R B R O W N , P L L C O n e C o m m e rc e S q u a re , S te . 1 7 0 0 M e m p h is , T N 3 8 1 0 3

F o r t h e A p p e lle e : P h ilip D . Irw in N E A L & H A R W E L L , P L C 2 0 0 0 F irs t U n io n T o w e r 1 5 0 F o u rth A v e n u e N o rth N a sh v ille , T N 3 7 2 1 9

A F F IR M E D

W IL L IA M H . IN M A N , S e n io r J u d g e C O N C U R :

W . F R A N K C R A W F O R D , J u d g e D A V ID R . F A R M E R , J u d g e

T h i s is a n a c t i o n to c o l l e c t 3 2 p r o m i s s o r y n o te s e x e c u te d b y th e d e f e n d a n t

in 1 9 8 5 , 1 9 8 6 , a n d 1 9 8 7 p a y a b le to U S A F a irf ie ld R e a lty F u n d , L T D . a n d a s sig n e d

to C itiz e n s F e d e r a l B a n k , N .A ., o n o rd e r, o n D e c e m b e r 2 0 , 1 9 9 1 , w ith o u t r e c o u r s e .

A p p e n d ix A i s a d i a g r a m m a t i c e x p l a n a t i o n o f t h e c o m m e r c i a l l i n e a g e o f th e

d e fe n d a n t.

T h e s e e n t itie s a re in v e s tm e n t v e h ic le s w h o s e p a r e n t c o m p a n y , U S A

P r o p e r t i e s F u n d , I n c ., 1 e x c l u s i v e l y m a n a g e d t h e b u s i n e s s a f f a i r s o f M i l l i n g t o n

H o m e s , a n a p a r t m e n t c o m p l e x lo c a t e d in t h e C i t y o f M i l l i n g t o n w h o s e g o v e r n i n g

b o d y c h a n g e d th e z o n i n g d e s i g n a ti o n f r o m r e s i d e n ti a l t o i n d u s t r i a l w h i c h , w h e n

fin a liz e d , w o u ld h a v e trig g e re d fo re c lo s u re o f th e fe d e ra l fin a n c in g m o r tg a g e s .

T h i s lo o m in g p r o b le m g a v e im p e tu s to a s a le o f th e a p a r t m e n t s t o t h e C i t y o f

M i l l i n g t o n . T h e p la in t i f f b a n k , a n a l l e g e d u n s e c u r e d c r e d it o r o f t h e d e fe n d a n t b y

v i r t u e o f it s a s s e r te d o w n e r s h i p o f t h e p r o m i s s o r y n o t e s , f i le d t h i s a c t io n t o r e c o v e r

t h e p r o c e e d s o f t h e n o te s .2 T h e d e f e n d a n t p l e a d e d (1 ) t h e b a r o f t h e S t a t u t e o f

L i m i t a t i o n s , T .C .A . § 2 8 - 3 - 1 0 9 ( c ) f o r a ll n o te s d a te d b e f o r e J a n u a r y 1 4 , 1 9 8 7 ; ( 2 )

e s t o p p e l, a l l e g i n g t h a t t h e p l a i n t i f f “ r e p r e s e n t e d t o d e fe n d a n t t h a t i t w o u l d a c c e p t

a l e s s e r a m o u n t i n s a t is f a c t i o n o f th e n o t e s ; ( 3 ) a g e n e r a l d e n i a l o f th e a l l e g a t io n s .

1 Edward Herzog is an officer and/or an agent for all but one (USA Millington Homes, Ltd.) of these commercial entities: 1. USA Fairfield; 2. Vice-President of (Defendant/Appellant) Millington Homes Investors, Ltd.; 3. Vice-President of USA Properties Fund, Inc., and authorized signatory on behalf of USA Fairfield; 4. Vice-President of Finance for (Defendant/Appellant) Millington Homes Investors, Ltd.; 5. Vice-President of USA Millington Homes, Inc.; 6. Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer of USA Properties Fund, Inc. 2 Both its 75% interest, and, as agent, the remaining 25%. The total amount attached was circa $800,000.

2 T o t h e p le a d i n g o f t h e d e f e n d a n t o f e s t o p p e l, t h e p la in t i f f r e li e d u p o n th e S t a t u t e

o f F r a u d s , T .C .A . § 2 9 -2 - 1 0 1 ( b ) ( 1 ) .

T h e m o ti o n o f t h e p la in ti f f f o r s u m m a ry ju d g m e n t w a s g r a n te d u p o n a

fin d in g b y t h e C h a n c e l lo r t h a t th e a c t io n w a s ( 1 ) n o t ti m e - b a r r e d , a n d ( 2 )

n o t w i t h s t a n d in g t h a t a d is p u t e e x i s t e d a s t o w h e th e r t h e p l a i n t i f f o r a l l y a g r e e d t o

a c c e p t a le s s e r s u m t h a n w a s o w i n g o n t h e n o t e s , s u c h d i s p u t e d id n o t i n v o lv e a

m a te ria l is su e b e c a u s e th e a lle g e d p r o m is e w a s n e v e r re d u c e d to w ritin g . T h e

d e fe n d a n t a p p e a ls , a n d p r e se n ts fo r re v ie w tw o is su e s w h ic h w e re p r o d u c e in h a e c

ve rb a :

I. W h e th e r t h e t r ia l c o u r t e r r e d i n r u l in g t h a t N a t io n s B a n k ’ s a g r e e m e n t to a c c e p t a le s s e r s u m in s a tis fa c tio n o f M illin g to n H o m e s ’ lia b ility , a n d N a tio n s B a n k ’s a g re e m e n t to p u t th a t a g r e e m e n t i n w r i t i n g , a re b a r r e d b y th e S ta tu te o f F r a u d s p r o v id e d b y T .C .A . § 2 9 -2 - 1 0 1 ( b ) ( 1 ) .

II. W h e th e r t h e t r i a l c o u r t e r r e d i n r u l i n g t h a t t h e S t a t u t e o f L im ita tio n s p r o v id e d b y T .C .A . § 2 8 -3 - 1 0 9 ( c ) d id n o t b a r a n y o f N a t io n s B a n k ’ s c la i m s .3

W e s h a ll re s ta te in c o n te x t th e id e n tity a n d p o s tu re o f th e e n t it ie s w h o a r e

d ire c tly o r p e rip h e ra lly in v o lv e d in th is litig a tio n .

T h e d e f e n d a n t , M i l l i n g t o n H o m e s , i s a T e n n e s s e e l im i t e d p a r tn e r s h i p w h o s e

g e n e ra l p a rtn e r is U S A M illin g to n H o m e s L T D . U S A M illin g to n H o m e s L T D is

a T e n n e s se e lim ite d p a rtn e rs h ip w h o s e g e n e ra l p a rtn e r is U S A M illin g to n H o m e s ,

In c . U S A M i l l i n g t o n H o m e s , I n c ., i s a T e n n e s s e e c o r p o r a ti o n w h o s e s to c k i s

o w n e d b y U S A P r o p e rtie s F u n d , In c .

In 1 9 8 4 , U S A P r o p e r t i e s F u n d , I n c ., e n te r e d in t o a j o i n t v e n t u r e w i t h

E q u it a b le S e r v i c e s C o r p o r a t i o n ( “ E q u i t a b l e ” ) , a s u b s i d i a r y o f C i t i z e n s F e d e r a l

3 At the outset, we note that some arguments of the defendant, such as its insistence that the plaintiff did not own the notes when suit was filed, are not the subject of an issue presented for review. Accordingly, we will confine our discussion of the case to the issues presented.

3 S a v in g s & L o a n A s so c ia tio n , la te r k n o w n a s C itiz e n s F e d e r a l B a n k (“ C itiz e n s ” ).

T h e jo i n t v e n tu r e w a s n a m e d U S A / F a ir f i e ld R e a l t y F u n d L T D ( “ U S A F a i r f ie l d ” ) .

U S A P r o p e r tie s F u n d , In c ., w a s th e g e n e r a l p a r tn e r o f U S A F a ir f ie ld , a n d

E q u i ta b l e w a s i t s s o l e l i m i te d p a r t n e r .

O n D ecem b er 3 , 1 99 1 , U S A F a irfie ld , U S A P r o p e rtie s F u n d , In c . a n d

E q u it a b le e n t e r e d i n t o a n a g re e m e n t w h e re b y E q u it a b le w o u ld tr a n s f e r 3 .6 5 % o f

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Union Carbide Corp. v. Huddleston
854 S.W.2d 87 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1993)
Campbell v. Florida Steel Corp.
919 S.W.2d 26 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Nations Bank N.A. South v. Millington Homes Investors, LTD., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nations-bank-na-south-v-millington-homes-investors-tennctapp-1999.