National Small Shipments Traffic Conference, Inc. v. Ringsby Truck Lines, Inc.
389 U.S. 576
Opinion
NATIONAL SMALL SHIPMENTS TRAFFIC CONFERENCE, INC., ET AL.
v.
RINGSBY TRUCK LINES, INC., ET AL.
Supreme Court of United States.
Arthur A. Arsham, John J. C. Martin and Max L. Wymore for appellants.
LeGrand Alf Carlston and Z. L. Pearson, Jr., for appellees.
Solicitor General Griswold, former Solicitor General Marshall and Robert W. Ginnane for the United States et al.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed as moot.
MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS dissents.
MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
National Small Shipments Traffic Conference, Inc. v. Ringsby Truck Lines, Inc., 389 U.S. 576 (1968).
389 U.S. 576 (National Small Shipments Traffic Conference, Inc. v. Ringsby Truck Lines, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ringsby Truck Lines, Inc., (Plaintiffs Below) v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, (Defendantsbelow) v. The National Small Shipments Traffic Conference, Inc., and Drug Andtoilet Preparation Traffic Conference, (Intervening Defendantsbelow)
490 F.2d 620 (Tenth Circuit, 1974)
Ringsby Truck Lines, Inc. v. United States
490 F.2d 620 (Tenth Circuit, 1973)
Pittsburgh & New England Trucking Co. v. United States
345 F. Supp. 743 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1972)