National Resort Management Corp. v. Cortez
This text of 278 F. App'x 377 (National Resort Management Corp. v. Cortez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We VACATE the judgment of the district court and REMAND for reconsideration in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Hall Street Associates, L.L.C. v. Mattel, Inc., — U.S.-, 128 S.Ct. 1396, 170 L.Ed.2d 254 (2008) (holding that, regardless of the parties’ agreement to the contrary, district courts must review an arbitrator’s findings of fact and conclusions of law under the highly deferential standard set forth in 9 U.S.C. § 10(a)).
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
278 F. App'x 377, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-resort-management-corp-v-cortez-ca5-2008.