National Labor Relations Board v. Teamsters Local No. 372

209 F.3d 936
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedApril 4, 2000
Docket289
StatusPublished

This text of 209 F.3d 936 (National Labor Relations Board v. Teamsters Local No. 372) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
National Labor Relations Board v. Teamsters Local No. 372, 209 F.3d 936 (6th Cir. 2000).

Opinion

209 F.3d 936 (6th Cir. 2000)

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, petitioner,
v.
TEAMSTERS LOCAL NO. 372, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, AFL-CIO; Detroit Mailers Union No. 2040, International

Brotherhood of Teamsters, ADL-CIO; GCIU Local 289, Graphic Communications International Union, AFL-CIO; Newspaper Guild of Detroit, Local 22, The Newspaper GUILD, AFL-CIO; Detroit Typographical Union No. 18, Communications Workers of America, AFL-CIO; and Metropolitan Council of Newspaper Unions, Respondents.

No. 96-6033.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

April 4, 2000.

Before: MARTIN, Chief Judge; KRUPANSKY and DAUGHTREY, Circuit Judges.

SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL CONSENT ORDER

On August 16, 1996, this court issued a judgment granting the application of the National Labor Relations Board (the "Board") for the enforcement of a certain order on consent issued by it against Teamsters Local No. 372, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, AFL-CIO (a/k/a Teamsters Local 372), Detroit Mailers Union No. 2040, International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local, AFL-CIO (a/k/a Detroit Mailers Union No. 40, IBT Local Union No. 2040), GCIU Local 289, Graphic Communications International Union, AFL-CIO (a/k/a Graphic Communication International Union, Local 289M), GCIU Local Union No. 13N, Graphic Communication International Union, 13N), Newspaper Guild of Detroit, Local 22) Detroit, Local 22, The Newspaper Guild, AFL-CIO (a/k/a Newspaper Guild of Detroit, Local 22), Detroit Typographical Union No. 18, Communications Workers of America, AFL-CIO (a/k/a Detroit Typographical Union No. 18 CWA/ITU), and Metropolitan Council of Newspaper Unions (collectively "respondent"). On March 10, 1997, this court issued a consent order containing several affirmative provisions, and imposing, but not assessing, prospective noncompliance fines for future violations of this court's August 16, 1996 judgment and March 10, 1997 consent order. On June 4, 1998, this court issued a supplement consent order containing additional affirmative provisions, assessed a non-compliance fine of $5000, and reimposed prospective noncompliance fines for future violations of this court's August 16, 1996 judgment, March 10, 1997 consent order, and June 4, 1998 supplemental consent order.

On October 22, 1999 and January 27, 2000, Detroit Newspapers, Detroit Free Press and The Detroit News filed charges (7-CB-12236 and 7-CB-12325) with Board alleging that respondents had engaged in conduct violative of this court's August 16, 1999 judgment, March 10,1997 consent order, and June 4, 1998 supplemental consent order, and respondents denied having violated the judgment and consent orders. The Board and respondents, desiring to settle this matter, and respondents not admitting that they have violated the judgment or the consent orders, have move this court to issue a second supplemental consent order and approve the parties' Settlement Stipulation as full disposition of the allegations that respondents are in contempt of this court's August 16, 1996 judgment, March 10,1997 consent order, and June 4, 1998 supplemental consent order, and good cause therefore being shown;

I.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the said Settlement Stipulation is incorporated here and is approved and shall be filed.

II.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents, individually an collectively, their officers, agents, and representatives, shall fully comply with and obey this court's August 16, 1996 judgment, March 10, 1997 consent order, June 4, 1998 supplemental consent order, and this second supplemental consent order, and not in any way, by action or inaction, engage in, induce or encourage any violation of this court's August 16, 1996 judgment, March 10, 1997 consent order, June 4, 1998 supplemental consent order, or this second supplemental consent order.

III.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the respondent shall:

(1) Within ten (10) days after service thereof by the Board, duplicate and post copies of the Notice of Members ("Notice"), prepared by the Board and signed by an officer of each respondent, alongside copies of this second supplemental consent order, in conspicuous places in each of the respondents' business offices and other places within each respondent's territorial jurisdiction where notices to officers and members are customarily posted, for a period of not less than sixty (60) consecutive days; and maintain said Notices and this second supplemental consent order in clearly legible condition throughout the posting period and ensure that they are not altered, defaced, or covered by other material; and provide to the Board's Seventh Regional Office within ten (10) days of posting a listing of the locations where the Notice and second supplemental consent orders are posted;

(2) Within thirty (30) days after the entry of this second supplemental consent order, provide a copy of this court's August 16, 1996 judgment, the signed Notice, this court's March 10, 1997 consent order, this court's June 4, 1998 supplemental consent order, and this second supplemental consent order to every officer, agent, or representative of every respondent employed from March10, 1997 to the date of entry of this second supplemental consent order, and have each such person sign and date an acknowledgement that they have read and understand that they must comply with this court's August 16, 1996 judgment, March 10, 1997 consent order, June 4, 1998 supplemental consent order, and this second supplemental consent order ("Acknowledgement Receipt"); and within ten (10) days of said delivery, provide the Board's Seventh Regional Office with a list of the names, positions, and addresses of all persons to whom delivery was made;

(3) Within thirty (30) days after entry of this second supplemental consent order, mail to the Board's Seventh Regional Office a copy of the signed Notice for position at the offices of the employers affected by these proceedings, for posting at their facilities, if such employers be willing;

(4) Have the Notice read by an officer of each respondent at a regularly scheduled meeting of its membership following entry of this second supplemental consent order, but not more than sixty (60) days after receipt of the Notice. The Board's Seventh Regional Office shall be given at least one (1) week's advance notice of each such meeting and the time designated for such reading; and Board agents shall be permitted to attend the reading in the discretion of the Regional Director for the Board's Seventh Region;

(5) Within thirty (30) days after the entry of this second supplemental consent order, attach a copy of this court's August 16, 1996 judgment, March 10, 1997 consent order, June 4, 1998 supplemental consent order, this second supplemental consent order, and the Notice to a strike benefit check of each member of any respondent who is receiving strike benefits and have each such member sign and date a receipt ("Acknowledgement Receipt") acknowledging that they have read and understand that they must comply with this court's august 16, 1996 judgment, March 10, 1997 consent order, June 4, 1998 supplemental consent order, and this second supplemental consent order; and

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
209 F.3d 936, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-labor-relations-board-v-teamsters-local-no-372-ca6-2000.