National Labor Relations Board v. Teamsters' Freight Local No. 480

409 F.2d 610, 71 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2111, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 12692
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedApril 23, 1969
Docket18789_1
StatusPublished

This text of 409 F.2d 610 (National Labor Relations Board v. Teamsters' Freight Local No. 480) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
National Labor Relations Board v. Teamsters' Freight Local No. 480, 409 F.2d 610, 71 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2111, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 12692 (6th Cir. 1969).

Opinion

409 F.2d 610

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner,
v.
TEAMSTERS' FREIGHT LOCAL NO. 480, affiliated with the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, Respondent.

No. 18789.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

April 23, 1969.

Leonard M. Wagman, N.L.R.B., Washington, D. C., for petitioner; Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Herbert Fishgold, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D. C., on brief.

Cecil D. Branstetter, Nashville, Tenn., for respondent; Carrol D. Kilgore, Nashville, Tenn., on brief.

Mullinax, Wells, Mauzy, Levy & Richards, by L. N. D. Wells, Jr., Dallas, Tex., on brief of amicus curiae Southern Conference of Teamsters.

Before WEICK, Chief Judge, and PHILLIPS and CELEBREZZE, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The National Labor Relations Board has petitioned for enforcement of its order finding the Respondent, Teamsters' Freight Local No. 480 guilty of violations of Sections 8(b) (1) (A) and 8(b) (2) of the National Labor Relations Act. The Board's decision and order are reported at 167 N.L.R.B. No. 135.

The cause having come on to be heard upon the record, briefs and arguments of counsel, and upon due consideration thereof, the Court is of the opinion that there is substantial evidence upon the record, viewed as a whole, to support the findings of the Board.

Now therefore, it is ordered that the petition for enforcement of the said order of the Board may be, and it is hereby granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
409 F.2d 610, 71 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2111, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 12692, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-labor-relations-board-v-teamsters-freight-local-no-480-ca6-1969.