National Labor Relations Board v. National Medical Hospital of Modesto, Inc., D/B/A Doctors Hospital of Modesto

Ninth Circuit

National Labor Relations Board v. National Medical Hospital of Modesto, Inc., D/B/A Doctors Hospital of Modesto

528 F.2d 938

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 10, 1976

Docket74--2636

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 528 F.2d 938 (National Labor Relations Board v. National Medical Hospital of Modesto, Inc., D/B/A Doctors Hospital of Modesto) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

National Labor Relations Board v. National Medical Hospital of Modesto, Inc., D/B/A Doctors Hospital of Modesto, 528 F.2d 938 (9th Cir. 1976).

Pincite

Opinions

[939]*939OPINION

Before BROWNING and TRASK, Circuit Judges, and SWEIGERT,* District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

The reasons for the Board’s order are briefly but adequately stated in its decisions in this unfair labor practice proceeding (210 NLRB No. 117) and the underlying representation proceeding. They have support in the record and reflect a reasonable interpretation of the statute. See NLRB v. Staiman Bros., 466 F.2d 564, 566 (3rd Cir. 1972); NLRB v. Pacific Gamble Robinson Co., 438 F.2d 112, 113 (9th Cir. 1971); Westchester Plastics of Ohio, Inc. v. NLRB, 401 F.2d 903, 908 (6th Cir. 1968); Trailmobile Division Pullman, Inc. v. NLRB, 379 F.2d 419, 423 (5th Cir. 1967).

The Board’s order will be enforced.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[939]*939OPINION

Before BROWNING and TRASK, Circuit Judges, and SWEIGERT,* District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

The reasons for the Board’s order are briefly but adequately stated in its decisions in this unfair labor practice proceeding (210 NLRB No. 117) and the underlying representation proceeding. They have support in the record and reflect a reasonable interpretation of the statute. See NLRB v. Staiman Bros., 466 F.2d 564, 566 (3rd Cir. 1972); NLRB v. Pacific Gamble Robinson Co., 438 F.2d 112, 113 (9th Cir. 1971); Westchester Plastics of Ohio, Inc. v. NLRB, 401 F.2d 903, 908 (6th Cir. 1968); Trailmobile Division Pullman, Inc. v. NLRB, 379 F.2d 419, 423 (5th Cir. 1967).

The Board’s order will be enforced.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

528 F.2d 938, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-labor-relations-board-v-national-medical-hospital-of-modesto-ca9-1976.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack