National Labor Relations Board v. Mackneish
This text of 272 F.2d 184 (National Labor Relations Board v. Mackneish) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The National Labor Relations Board found that respondents, in this case, by lockout, permanent shutdown, transfer of operations, and refusal to negotiate with the Union involved, concerning grievances, had violated Section 8(a) (5) (3) and (1) of the National Labor Relations Act as amended, 29 U.S.C.A. § 158 (a) (1, 3, 5); and that respondents Mackneish and Industrial Fabricating, Inc., had, by discrimination, failed to recall three employees, and had discharged two other employees in violation of Section 8(a) (3) and (1) of the Act.
The testimony, introduced on behalf of the opposing parties, was in conflict. The issue is essentially one of fact; and determination of the facts, and the inferences to be drawn therefrom are for the Board. A review of the copious record discloses that the Board’s findings were supported by substantial evidence on the record, considered as a whole.
[185]*185The petition of the Board for enforcement of its order is, accordingly, granted, and a decree enforcing the order will, therefore, be granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
272 F.2d 184, 45 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2137, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-labor-relations-board-v-mackneish-ca6-1959.