National Labor Relations Board v. Lloyd J. Taylor, D/B/A Taylor Foundry Company
This text of 338 F.2d 1003 (National Labor Relations Board v. Lloyd J. Taylor, D/B/A Taylor Foundry Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this proceeding to enforce the Board’s order finding the Employer guilty of a § 8(a) (5) violation for failure to bargain by declining to furnish financial information, only two questions exist, neither of which presents any distinctive propositions of law. The first is the sufficiency of the evidence, NLRB v. Truitt Manufacturing Co., 1956, 351 U.S. 149, 76 S.Ct. 753, 100 L.Ed. 1027, that the employer was claiming financial inability to meet the Union wage demands. The other was the question whether the Union’s reduced wage demand made a month later constituted a waiver. As to the first, it was a pure fact question and ends there. As to the second, bearing in *1004 mind the requirement that waiver of rights under the Act must be clearly established, NLRB v. Item Co., 5 Cir., 1955, 220 F.2d 956, 958-959; cf. Sinclair Refg. Co. v. NLRB, 5 Cir., 1962, 306 F.2d 569, 575, the Board’s rejection of waiver was likewise sufficiently founded.
Enforced.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
338 F.2d 1003, 57 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2560, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 3750, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-labor-relations-board-v-lloyd-j-taylor-dba-taylor-foundry-ca5-1964.