National Labor Relations Board v. Daniels Construction Co. of Virginia

332 F.2d 791
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 18, 1964·No. No. 9274·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The Board seeks enforcement of its order based upon a finding by the Examiner 1 that the Respondent violated Section 8(a) (1) 2 of the National Labor Relations Act by discharging two of its employees for having sponsored the election of a particular person as shop foreman, a concerted activity protected by Section 73 of the Act. Our duty to examine the record as a whole to determine whether there is substantial evidence to support the Board's findings was made impossible by the Examiner’s ignoring without explanation or analysis and seemingly without consideration the evidence offered by the Respondent. No anti-union bias was found, and the Respondent’s offer of a coherent and logical explanation for its conduct deserves a less cavalier treatment.

Denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

National Labor Relations Board v. Daniels Construction Co. of Virginia, 332 F.2d 791 (4th Cir. 1964).

332 F.2d 791 (National Labor Relations Board v. Daniels Construction Co. of Virginia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related