National Labor Relations Board v. C. C. Lang & Son, Inc.

212 F.2d 436
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided April 21, 1954·No. No. 12152·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case came on to be heard upon the motion of the National Labor Relations Board for the summary entry of a decree, respondent’s motion for leave to adduce additional evidence, and memorandum of the petitioner in opposition thereto;

And it appearing that there has been no response to the order of the Board charging unfair labor practices and that the request to adduce additional evidence is directed to the point of alleged compliance with the Board’s order;

And it appearing that compliance with the Board’s order does not render the order moot nor constitute a defense to a petition for enforcement, National Labor Relations Board v. Mexia Textile Mills, Inc., 339 U.S. 563, 567, 569, 70 S. Ct. 826, 833, 94 L.Ed. 1067;

It is ordered that the motion for leave to adduce additional evidence be and it hereby is denied;

• And it is ordered that the order of the Board be enforced.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

National Labor Relations Board v. C. C. Lang & Son, Inc., 212 F.2d 436 (6th Cir. 1954).

212 F.2d 436 (National Labor Relations Board v. C. C. Lang & Son, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related