National Labor Relations Board v. Beverage-Air Company, International Union of Electrical, Radio and MacHine Workers, Afl-Cio, Intervenor

391 F.2d 255, 67 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2763, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 8041
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 15, 1968
Docket11961_1
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 391 F.2d 255 (National Labor Relations Board v. Beverage-Air Company, International Union of Electrical, Radio and MacHine Workers, Afl-Cio, Intervenor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
National Labor Relations Board v. Beverage-Air Company, International Union of Electrical, Radio and MacHine Workers, Afl-Cio, Intervenor, 391 F.2d 255, 67 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2763, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 8041 (4th Cir. 1968).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The National Labor Relations Board, pursuant to Section 10(e) of the Labor Act [29 U.S.C. § 160(e)], moved for enforcement of its order pendente lite requiring Beverage-Air Company to cease and desist from continuing to restrain and coerce its employees in the exercise of their rights guaranteed by § 7 of the act [29 U.S.C. § 157]. The uncontroverted evidence establishes reasonable cause to believe the act has been violated and that the remedial purposes of the act will be frustrated unless relief pendente lite is granted. NLRB v. Aerovox Corp., of Myrtle Beach, 389 F.2d 475, 67 L.R.R.M. 2158 (4th Cir. 1967).

The Board’s motion will be granted to this extent: the respondent must cease and desist from enforcing a no solicitation rule in nonworking areas of the plant during nonworking time, and from continuing to discriminate against employees who are union supporters with respect to the terms and conditions of employment. The Board’s motion to require reinstatement of discharged employees pendente lite is denied. Counsel for the Board is directed to submit to the court a proposed order after furnishing a copy to counsel for the respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
391 F.2d 255, 67 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2763, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 8041, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-labor-relations-board-v-beverage-air-company-international-union-ca4-1968.