National Labor Relations Board v. Arkansas Rice Growers Cooperative Association

Eighth Circuit

National Labor Relations Board v. Arkansas Rice Growers Cooperative Association

395 F.2d 745, 68 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2575, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 6586

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedJune 11, 1968

Docket19087_1

StatusPublished

This text of 395 F.2d 745 (National Labor Relations Board v. Arkansas Rice Growers Cooperative Association) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

National Labor Relations Board v. Arkansas Rice Growers Cooperative Association, 395 F.2d 745, 68 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2575, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 6586 (8th Cir. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The National Labor Relations Board petitions this Court for enforcement of *746 its order issued against Respondent, Arkansas Rice Growers Cooperative Association. The Board’s decision and order are reported at 162 NLRB No. 149.

The Board adopted the Trial Examiner’s findings of fact and conclusions of law to the effect that Respondent violated Section 8(a) (3) and (1) of the National Labor Relations Act by imposing more arduous working conditions on employee Ervin Davis, and by subsequently discharging him because of his union activities. The sole question for decision is whether the Board’s findings are supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole.

After careful analysis of all of the evidence, we conclude that the petition of the Board should be granted. The order will be enforced.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The National Labor Relations Board petitions this Court for enforcement of *746 its order issued against Respondent, Arkansas Rice Growers Cooperative Association. The Board’s decision and order are reported at 162 NLRB No. 149.

The Board adopted the Trial Examiner’s findings of fact and conclusions of law to the effect that Respondent violated Section 8(a) (3) and (1) of the National Labor Relations Act by imposing more arduous working conditions on employee Ervin Davis, and by subsequently discharging him because of his union activities. The sole question for decision is whether the Board’s findings are supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole.

After careful analysis of all of the evidence, we conclude that the petition of the Board should be granted. The order will be enforced.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

395 F.2d 745, 68 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2575, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 6586, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-labor-relations-board-v-arkansas-rice-growers-cooperative-ca8-1968.