National Labor Relations Board v. American Rolling Mill Co.

Sixth Circuit

National Labor Relations Board v. American Rolling Mill Co.

154 F.2d 57

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 25, 1946

DocketNo. 10026

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 154 F.2d 57 (National Labor Relations Board v. American Rolling Mill Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

National Labor Relations Board v. American Rolling Mill Co., 154 F.2d 57 (6th Cir. 1946).

Pincite

Opinion

MARTIN, Circuit Judge.

The decision of the National Labor Relations Board in this case is supported by substantial evidence; but in our judgment Paragraph 1 (b) of its order is too broad to conform to the limitations expressed and applied in May Department Stores Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 66 S.Ct. 203. Compare National Labor Relations Board v. Express Publishing Co., 312 U.S. 426, 61 S.Ct. 693, 85 L.Ed. 930.

Accordingly, Paragraph 1(b) of the order of the Board will be amended by dedetiug the following words at the end of the paragraph: “to bargain collectively through representatives of cheir own choosing, and to engage m concerted activities, for the purpose of collective bargaining or other mutual aid or protection as guaranteed in Section 7 of the Act [29 U.S.C.A. § 157].” A period will be substituted for the comma immediately preceding the deleted wordst of the paragraph. See National Labor Relations Board v. Federal Engineering Company, Inc., et al., 6 Cir., 153 F.2d 233.

With the specified modification, the order of the National Labor Relations Board is directed to be enforced.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MARTIN, Circuit Judge.

The decision of the National Labor Relations Board in this case is supported by substantial evidence; but in our judgment Paragraph 1 (b) of its order is too broad to conform to the limitations expressed and applied in May Department Stores Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 66 S.Ct. 203. Compare National Labor Relations Board v. Express Publishing Co., 312 U.S. 426, 61 S.Ct. 693, 85 L.Ed. 930.

Accordingly, Paragraph 1(b) of the order of the Board will be amended by dedetiug the following words at the end of the paragraph: “to bargain collectively through representatives of cheir own choosing, and to engage m concerted activities, for the purpose of collective bargaining or other mutual aid or protection as guaranteed in Section 7 of the Act [29 U.S.C.A. § 157].” A period will be substituted for the comma immediately preceding the deleted wordst of the paragraph. See National Labor Relations Board v. Federal Engineering Company, Inc., et al., 6 Cir., 153 F.2d 233.

With the specified modification, the order of the National Labor Relations Board is directed to be enforced.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

154 F.2d 57, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-labor-relations-board-v-american-rolling-mill-co-ca6-1946.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack