National Council of American-Soviet Friendship, Inc. v. Subversive Activities Control Board

D.C. Circuit

National Council of American-Soviet Friendship, Inc. v. Subversive Activities Control Board

301 F.2d 518

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedJanuary 10, 1962

Docket13260_1

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 301 F.2d 518 (National Council of American-Soviet Friendship, Inc. v. Subversive Activities Control Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

National Council of American-Soviet Friendship, Inc. v. Subversive Activities Control Board, 301 F.2d 518 (D.C. Cir. 1962).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Counsel having appeared before this court for a prehearing conference, and it appearing that counsel for petitioner asserts that numerous alleged findings of fact included in the Report and Order of the Board here under review are without the support of substantial evidence in the record as a whole; and it further appearing that the Board in response insists that all its findings are fully supported by substantial evidence in the record; and it further appearing that the record in this cause is voluminous, consisting of some 5400 pages of transcript of testimony and about 300 exhibits, some of which are voluminous; and it appearing that petitioner alleges it is without funds with which to reproduce any considerable portion of the record for the use of the judges of the court; it is hereby

ORDERED by the court that on or before February 23, 1962, petitioner shall file herein a statement showing a selected number of findings of fact contained in the Board’s Report which findings petitioner says are (1) material to the issue in the case, (2) typical as a [519]*519factual foundation for the point which petitioner wishes to make upon this review as to the sufficiency of the evidence and (3) without substantial support in the record as a whole.

Further proceedings in this matter will be the subject of further orders of the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Counsel having appeared before this court for a prehearing conference, and it appearing that counsel for petitioner asserts that numerous alleged findings of fact included in the Report and Order of the Board here under review are without the support of substantial evidence in the record as a whole; and it further appearing that the Board in response insists that all its findings are fully supported by substantial evidence in the record; and it further appearing that the record in this cause is voluminous, consisting of some 5400 pages of transcript of testimony and about 300 exhibits, some of which are voluminous; and it appearing that petitioner alleges it is without funds with which to reproduce any considerable portion of the record for the use of the judges of the court; it is hereby

ORDERED by the court that on or before February 23, 1962, petitioner shall file herein a statement showing a selected number of findings of fact contained in the Board’s Report which findings petitioner says are (1) material to the issue in the case, (2) typical as a [519]*519factual foundation for the point which petitioner wishes to make upon this review as to the sufficiency of the evidence and (3) without substantial support in the record as a whole.

Further proceedings in this matter will be the subject of further orders of the court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

301 F.2d 518, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-council-of-american-soviet-friendship-inc-v-subversive-cadc-1962.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack