National Bank of Pakistan v. Basham
539 N.E.2d 101, 73 N.Y.2d 1000, 541 N.Y.S.2d 345, 1989 N.Y. LEXIS 491
Opinion
[1002]*1002OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs, and certified question answered in the affirmative for the reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division (142 AD2d 532).
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa. Taking no part: Judge Kaye.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
National Bank of Pakistan v. Basham, 539 N.E.2d 101, 73 N.Y.2d 1000, 541 N.Y.S.2d 345, 1989 N.Y. LEXIS 491 (N.Y. 1989).
539 N.E.2d 101 (National Bank of Pakistan v. Basham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Keybank Natl. Assn. v. National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, PA
124 A.D.3d 512 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
Auto Lenders Acceptance Corp. v. Gentilini Ford, Inc.
854 A.2d 378 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2004)
Federal Deposit Insurance v. National Union Fire Insurance
205 F.3d 66 (Second Circuit, 2000)
First National Bank of Louisville v. Loretta Lustig, Aetna Casualty and Surety Co., and Federal Insurance Co.
96 F.3d 1554 (First Circuit, 1996)
Susquehanna Bancshares, Inc. v. National Union Fire Insurance
659 A.2d 991 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1995)
Heller International Corporation v. Alec Sharp
974 F.2d 850 (Seventh Circuit, 1992)
Columbia Equities, Ltd. v. Underwriters at Lloyd's
186 A.D.2d 486 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
Heller International Corp. v. Sharp
974 F.2d 850 (Seventh Circuit, 1992)
Adair State Bank v. American Casualty Co. of Reading
949 F.2d 1067 (Tenth Circuit, 1991)
Adair State Bank, an Oklahoma Banking Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania, Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee. Adair State Bank, an Oklahoma Banking Corporation v. American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania
949 F.2d 1067 (Tenth Circuit, 1991)