National Association for the Advancement of Colored People of Louisiana and Emmitt J. Douglas v. Louis J. Michot, Etc.

480 F.2d 547, 17 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1418, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 9484
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJune 11, 1973
Docket73-1312
StatusPublished
Cited by26 cases

This text of 480 F.2d 547 (National Association for the Advancement of Colored People of Louisiana and Emmitt J. Douglas v. Louis J. Michot, Etc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
National Association for the Advancement of Colored People of Louisiana and Emmitt J. Douglas v. Louis J. Michot, Etc., 480 F.2d 547, 17 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1418, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 9484 (5th Cir. 1973).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After a complete review of the record, it is our considered opinion that this court does not have jurisdiction to hear the instant appeal 'and thus we are compelled to dismiss. We reach this conclusion on two alternative grounds. First, this is an appeal from the lower court’s order denying appellant’s motion to consolidate its case with a suit previously filed in that court. A trial court has broad discretion in determining whether to consolidate a ease pending before it. An order denying consolidation is not a final appealable order. See, 9 Wright & Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure, § 2386 (1971); United States v. Chelsea Towers, Inc., 404 F.2d 329 (3d Cir. 1968).

Furthermore, appellant did not timely perfect an appeal. Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure requires that a notice of appeal be filed in the district court within thirty days. The order denying consolidation was entered on November 28, 1972, but appellant did not file its notice of appeal until December 29, 1972. Thus thirty-one days elapsed before the notice of appeal was filed and therefore this court is without jurisdiction to hear this appeal, in the absence of further proceedings in the district court under Rule 4(a), F.R. A.P., to determine the existence of excusable neglect in the late filing of the notice of appeal.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Henry McKinnon, III v. Birdsong
Eleventh Circuit, 2026
Lucas v. Lumpkin
Fifth Circuit, 2025
Matthews v. Herman
E.D. Louisiana, 2020
Moran v. Landrum-Johnson
E.D. Louisiana, 2020
Hofmann v. DE MARCHENA KALUCHE & ASOCIADOS
642 F.3d 995 (Eleventh Circuit, 2011)
Charles Dewayne Walther v. Donald F. Bauknecht
155 F. App'x 463 (Eleventh Circuit, 2005)
Lyons Ex Rel. Lyons v. Andersen
123 F. Supp. 2d 485 (N.D. Iowa, 2000)
Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Henney
94 F. Supp. 2d 36 (District of Columbia, 2000)
In the Matter of Dwight L. Lieb, Debtor (Two Cases)
915 F.2d 180 (Fifth Circuit, 1990)
Byrd v. Travenol Laboratories, Inc.
675 F. Supp. 342 (N.D. Mississippi, 1987)
Irvin B. Alley v. Chrysler Credit Corporation
767 F.2d 138 (Fifth Circuit, 1985)
State Of Minnesota v. Pickands Mather & Co.
636 F.2d 251 (Eighth Circuit, 1980)
Minnesota v. Pickands Mather & Co.
636 F.2d 251 (Eighth Circuit, 1980)
Gordon v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc.
549 F.2d 1006 (Fifth Circuit, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
480 F.2d 547, 17 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1418, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 9484, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-association-for-the-advancement-of-colored-people-of-louisiana-and-ca5-1973.