Nathanson v. Norton

99 A. 1071, 86 N.J. Eq. 434, 1 Stock. 434, 1916 N.J. LEXIS 475
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Nathanson v. Norton. Read the opinion of the Court — 86 N.J. Eq. 435
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided November 20, 1916·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This case is controlled by the decision of No. 19 at this term. The decree is affirmed.

For affirmance — The Ci-iiee-Justioe, Garrison, Swayze, Trenohard, Pírker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisci-i, Black, White, Heppeniieimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner — 14.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nathanson v. Norton, 99 A. 1071, 86 N.J. Eq. 434, 1 Stock. 434, 1916 N.J. LEXIS 475 (N.J. 1916).

99 A. 1071 (Nathanson v. Norton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.