Nathanson v. Norton

99 A. 1071, 86 N.J. Eq. 434, 1 Stock. 434, 1916 N.J. LEXIS 475
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedNovember 20, 1916
StatusPublished

This text of 99 A. 1071 (Nathanson v. Norton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nathanson v. Norton, 99 A. 1071, 86 N.J. Eq. 434, 1 Stock. 434, 1916 N.J. LEXIS 475 (N.J. 1916).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This case is controlled by the decision of No. 19 at this term. The decree is affirmed.

For affirmance — The Ci-iiee-Justioe, Garrison, Swayze, Trenohard, Pírker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisci-i, Black, White, Heppeniieimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner — 14.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
99 A. 1071, 86 N.J. Eq. 434, 1 Stock. 434, 1916 N.J. LEXIS 475, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nathanson-v-norton-nj-1916.