Nathanael Lee Schoen v. the State of Texas
Opinion
FILE COPY
Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas
May 18, 2022
No. 04-22-00022-CR, 04-22-00023-CR, 04-22-00024-CR
Nathanael Lee SCHOEN,
Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas,
Appellee
From the 216th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas Trial Court No. A19182, A19183, A19184 Honorable Albert D. Pattillo, III, Judge Presiding
ORDER
Appellee’s attorney has filed a motion seeking access to “State’s Exhibit 34,” which appears in a portion of the record that is sealed. The motion is GRANTED. The clerk of the court is instructed to provide a copy of State’s Exhibit 34 to appellant’s attorney and appellee’s attorney on a USB flash drive. All parties and their attorneys are ORDERED not to share the contents of the sealed record with any person except to the extent necessary to prepare their respective briefs.
In the event appellee references the sealed record in its brief or appellant references it in his reply brief, if any, they are ORDERED to (1) file their respective briefs in paper form only, (2) with a cover letter informing the clerk of this court that the brief references the sealed record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.2(c)(3) (exception to electronic filing for documents under seal).
Beth Watkins, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 18th day of May, 2022.
FILE COPY
MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Nathanael Lee Schoen v. the State of Texas (Nathanael Lee Schoen v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.