Nathanael Lee Schoen v. the State of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided May 18, 2022·No. 04-22-00022-CR·Published

Opinion

FILE COPY

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 18, 2022

No. 04-22-00022-CR, 04-22-00023-CR, 04-22-00024-CR

Nathanael Lee SCHOEN,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 216th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas Trial Court No. A19182, A19183, A19184 Honorable Albert D. Pattillo, III, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellee’s attorney has filed a motion seeking access to “State’s Exhibit 34,” which appears in a portion of the record that is sealed. The motion is GRANTED. The clerk of the court is instructed to provide a copy of State’s Exhibit 34 to appellant’s attorney and appellee’s attorney on a USB flash drive. All parties and their attorneys are ORDERED not to share the contents of the sealed record with any person except to the extent necessary to prepare their respective briefs.

In the event appellee references the sealed record in its brief or appellant references it in his reply brief, if any, they are ORDERED to (1) file their respective briefs in paper form only, (2) with a cover letter informing the clerk of this court that the brief references the sealed record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.2(c)(3) (exception to electronic filing for documents under seal).

Beth Watkins, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 18th day of May, 2022.

FILE COPY

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nathanael Lee Schoen v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Nathanael Lee Schoen v. the State of Texas (Nathanael Lee Schoen v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.