Nathanael Lee Schoen v. the State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 15, 2022
Docket04-22-00022-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Nathanael Lee Schoen v. the State of Texas (Nathanael Lee Schoen v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nathanael Lee Schoen v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas February 15, 2022

No. 04-22-00022-CR, 04-22-00023-CR, and 04-22-00024-CR

Nathanael Lee SCHOEN, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

From the 216th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas Trial Court No. A19182, A19183, A19184 Honorable Albert D. Pattillo, III, Judge Presiding

ORDER

On February 11, 2022, appellant Nathanael Lee Schoen moved to consolidate these appeals. The motion indicates that appellant’s counsel conferred with the State and the State consents to consolidation. Having considered the motion to consolidate, we agree that, in the interest of efficient administration, these appeals should be consolidated. Appellant’s motion to consolidate is therefore GRANTED.

We ORDER Nos. 04-22-00022-CR, 04-22-00023-CR, and 04-22-00024-CR consolidated for purposes of the record, briefing, and argument on appeal. Because the records have not yet been filed in these appeals, the district clerk and court reporter must file the record as if the appeals were one, and the parties must file any motions and briefs as if the appeals were one. However, all three appeal numbers must be included on the documents. The cases must be argued together in one brief, as in a single appeal, and if oral argument is requested and granted, the entire case must be argued as a single appeal, with the total time limit for each party equal to the ordinary time limit for a single appeal. The court will dispose of the appeals with the same judgment, opinion, and mandate.

_________________________________ Beth Watkins, Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 15th day of February, 2022.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Nathanael Lee Schoen v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nathanael-lee-schoen-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2022.