Nathan Webster v. Fletcher, et al.

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. California
DecidedSeptember 23, 2025
Docket2:24-cv-01479
StatusUnknown

This text of Nathan Webster v. Fletcher, et al. (Nathan Webster v. Fletcher, et al.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nathan Webster v. Fletcher, et al., (E.D. Cal. 2025).

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 NATHAN WEBSTER, No. 2:24-cv-1479 AC P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 FLETCHER, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 On August 8, 2025, defendant filed a motion to dismiss. ECF No. 21. Defendant has now 18 filed a “Notice of Plaintiff’s Status” indicating that according to s Shasta County Sheriff’s Office 19 press release, plaintiff died on September 14, 2025. ECF No. 26. 20 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure provides a process applicable after a party to a civil action 21 has died. Of relevance here, it provides that “[i]f a party dies and the claim is not extinguished, 22 the court may order substitution of a proper party.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(a). If the decedent’s 23 successor or representative does not file a motion for substitution “within 90 days after service of 24 a statement noting the death, the action by or against the decedent must be dismissed.” Id. Under 25 California law—which federal courts apply in determining survival of a claim under 42 U.S.C. 26 § 1983—a cause of action against a person is generally not extinguished by that person’s death. 27 Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 377.20(a); see Robertson v. Wegmann, 436 U.S. 584, 590 (1978). 28 //// 1 The Ninth Circuit has explained that Rule 25 requires two affirmative steps to trigger the 2 || 90-day period: 3 First, a party must formally suggest the death of the party upon the record. Second, the suggesting party must serve other parties and 4 nonparty successors or representatives of the deceased with a suggestion of death in the same manner as required for service of the 5 motion to substitute. Thus, a party may be served the suggestion of death by service on his or her attorney, while nonparty successors or 6 representatives of the deceased party must be served the suggestion of death in the manner provided by Rule 4 for the service of a 7 summons. 8 | Barlow v. Ground, 39 F.3d 231, 233 (9th Cir. 1994) (internal citations omitted); see Fed. R. Civ. 9 || P. 25. Under Barlow, defendants have some obligation to identify plaintiffs representative or 10 || successor and to serve the notice of death on that party. 11 Considering the “Notice of Plaintiff's Status,” defendant’s motion to dismiss will be 12 || vacated. Defendants will be ordered to provide the court with a formal notice of plaintiffs death 13 || and to serve that notice on plaintiff's representative or successor. After the period for 14 || substitution, defendant may file a motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 25(a). 15 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 16 1. Inlight of the “Notice of Plaintiff's Status” (ECF No. 26), defendant’s motion to 17 || dismiss (ECF No. 21) is vacated. 18 2. Within fourteen days of the date of this order, defendant shall fill with the court a 19 | formal notice of plaintiff's death. 20 3. Within thirty days of the date of this order, defendant shall serve a formal notice of 21 || plaintiff's death on plaintiff's representative or successor in interest and file a certificate of 22 || service with the court. 23 || DATED: September 23, 2025 ~ 24 □□ ————e—r ALLISON CLAIRE 25 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Nathan Webster v. Fletcher, et al., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nathan-webster-v-fletcher-et-al-caed-2025.