Nathan D. Coleman v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Nathan D. Coleman v. State of Florida

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 15, 2016

Docket16-2214

StatusPublished

This text of Nathan D. Coleman v. State of Florida (Nathan D. Coleman v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nathan D. Coleman v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NATHAN D. COLEMAN, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Petitioner, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

v. CASE NO. 1D16-2214

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

___________________________/

Opinion filed August 16, 2016.

Petition for Writ of Mandamus -- Original Jurisdiction.

Nathan D. Coleman, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Tallahassee Bureau Chief, Criminal Appeals, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Munn v. Fla. Parole Comm’n,

807 So. 2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). We encourage the circuit court to continue its

efforts to expeditiously dispose of the motion pending below.

LEWIS, WETHERELL, and RAY, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI