Natchez Cotton Mills Co. v. Mullins

67 Miss. 672
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedApril 15, 1890
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 67 Miss. 672 (Natchez Cotton Mills Co. v. Mullins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Natchez Cotton Mills Co. v. Mullins, 67 Miss. 672 (Mich. 1890).

Opinion

Campbell, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The widow alone had the right of action, and she had the right to accept satisfaction, and discharge the defendant. Code, § 1510.

Her children must look to her, and not to the defendant. A mother’s love is a sufficient safeguard against improperly acquitting a defendant from liability, and the law in such cases as this has committed the interests of children to their mother. To her is committed the right of action, and she alone may control it. Stephens v. Railroad, 10 Lea, 448; McNamara v. Slavens, 76 Mo. 329.

Decree reversed\ demurrer sustained 'and hill dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mann v. Minnesota Electric Light & Power Co.
43 F.2d 36 (Tenth Circuit, 1930)
Parmley v. Pleasant Valley Coal Co.
228 P. 557 (Utah Supreme Court, 1924)
American Car & Foundry Co. v. Anderson
211 F. 301 (Eighth Circuit, 1914)
Conover v. Pennsylvania R.
176 F. 638 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1910)
Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Gipe
65 N.E. 1034 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1903)
Foot v. Great Northern Railway Co.
52 L.R.A. 354 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1900)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
67 Miss. 672, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/natchez-cotton-mills-co-v-mullins-miss-1890.