Natalie Aguilar v. the State of Texas
This text of Natalie Aguilar v. the State of Texas (Natalie Aguilar v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-24-00125-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG
NATALIE AGUILAR, Appellant,
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.
ON APPEAL FROM THE 28TH DISTRICT COURT OF NUECES COUNTY, TEXAS
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Benavides, Longoria, and Silva Memorandum Opinion by Justice Longoria
Upon review of the documents before the Court, it appears there is no final
appealable order. On February 16, 2024, appellant filed a notice of appeal attempting to
appeal a conviction in trial court cause number 17FC-1495A. In response to a late brief
notice, appellant filed a response informing that the trial court granted a new trial on April 3, 2024, and included a copy of the trial court’s order with the response. Therefore, the
Court is now without jurisdiction, as there is no final judgment of conviction before it.
Generally, a state appellate court only has jurisdiction to consider an appeal by a
criminal defendant where there has been a final judgment of conviction. Workman v.
State, 343 S.W.2d 446, 447 (Tex. Crim. App. 1961); McKown v. State, 915 S.W.2d 160,
161 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1996, no pet.). Exceptions to the general rule include:
(1) certain appeals while on deferred adjudication community supervision, Kirk v. State,
942 S.W.2d 624, 625 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997); (2) appeals from the denial of a motion to
reduce bond, TEX. R. APP. P. 31.1; McKown, 915 S.W.2d at 161; and (3) certain appeals
from the denial of habeas corpus relief, Wright v. State, 969 S.W.2d 588, 589 (Tex. App.—
Dallas 1998, no pet.); McKown, 915 S.W.2d at 161.
Our review of the documents before the Court shows that appellant’s case is still
pending in the trial court. Moreover, the notice of appeal cannot be construed as
premature because it was filed before the trial court made a finding of guilt or received a
jury verdict. See TEX. R. APP. P. 27.1(b). Therefore, this cause is dismissed for want of
jurisdiction.
NORA L. LONGORIA Justice
Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2 (b).
Delivered and filed on the 28th day of August, 2024.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Natalie Aguilar v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/natalie-aguilar-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2024.