Nasser v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Nasser v. State

630 N.E.2d 571, 1994 Ind. App. LEXIS 267, 1994 WL 81930

CourtIndiana Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 17, 1994

Docket49A02-9206-CR-283

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 630 N.E.2d 571 (Nasser v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nasser v. State, 630 N.E.2d 571, 1994 Ind. App. LEXIS 267, 1994 WL 81930 (Ind. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinions

SULLIVAN, Judge.

Jeffrey Nasser appeals his conviction of Operating a Vehicle with at least ten-hundredths percent (10%) by Weight of Alcohol in the Blood, a Class C misdemeanor.¹ The dispositive issue upon appeal is whether the evidence supports the judgment.

We reverse.

In brief, the facts reveal that in the early morning hours of November 14, 1990, Nasser was driving northbound on Meridian Street after dining and drinking in downtown Indianapolis. Nasser struck three parked cars when a vehicle swerved into his path forcing him to the side of the road. During the accident investigation, Officer Julie Schiff noted that Nasser appeared intoxicated. After administering field sobriety tests, Schiff transported Nasser to IPD headquarters. There, Nasser completed an Intoxilyzer 5000 Breath Test. The test resulted in a printout showing: "BAC Value" of ".14". Record at 202.

Indiana Code 9-11-2-1 provided: "A person who operates a vehicle with ten-hundredths percent [.10%], or more, by weight of alcohol in his blood commits a class C misdemeanor." (Emphasis supplied). Unless the State puts forth evidence of the amount of aleohol by weight in a person's blood, a conviction for this offense cannot stand. Melton v. State (1992) 4th Dist. Ind.App., 597 N.E.2d 359, trans. denied.

In Baran v. State (1993) 5th Dist. Ind.App., 622 N.E.2d 1326 (Rucker, J., dissenting), this court reversed a conviction in similar circumstances. Contra, Daum v. State (1993) 1st Dist. Ind.App., 625 N.E.2d 1296 (Hoffman, J., dissenting).

Here, the State introduced the results of the Intoxilyzer test. However, the State did not introduce evidence that the reported value was a percentage or that it was a measurement by weight of alcohol in Nasser's blood. Baran, supra, 622 N.E.2d at [572]*5721327. Although Nasser's counsel did not question the relevancy of the reported value, as did counsel in Baran, supra, such inquiry is not a requisite to Nasser's defense. It is the State's task to build its case based upon the elements of the offense charged. Having failed to do so, the evidence can not support the judgment.

The judgment of the trial court is reversed.

FRIEDLANDER, J., concurs. RUCKER, J., dissents with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SULLIVAN, Judge.

Jeffrey Nasser appeals his conviction of Operating a Vehicle with at least ten-hundredths percent (10%) by Weight of Alcohol in the Blood, a Class C misdemeanor.¹ The dispositive issue upon appeal is whether the evidence supports the judgment.

We reverse.

In brief, the facts reveal that in the early morning hours of November 14, 1990, Nasser was driving northbound on Meridian Street after dining and drinking in downtown Indianapolis. Nasser struck three parked cars when a vehicle swerved into his path forcing him to the side of the road. During the accident investigation, Officer Julie Schiff noted that Nasser appeared intoxicated. After administering field sobriety tests, Schiff transported Nasser to IPD headquarters. There, Nasser completed an Intoxilyzer 5000 Breath Test. The test resulted in a printout showing: "BAC Value" of ".14". Record at 202.

Indiana Code 9-11-2-1 provided: "A person who operates a vehicle with ten-hundredths percent [.10%], or more, by weight of alcohol in his blood commits a class C misdemeanor." (Emphasis supplied). Unless the State puts forth evidence of the amount of aleohol by weight in a person's blood, a conviction for this offense cannot stand. Melton v. State (1992) 4th Dist. Ind.App., 597 N.E.2d 359, trans. denied.

In Baran v. State (1993) 5th Dist. Ind.App., 622 N.E.2d 1326 (Rucker, J., dissenting), this court reversed a conviction in similar circumstances. Contra, Daum v. State (1993) 1st Dist. Ind.App., 625 N.E.2d 1296 (Hoffman, J., dissenting).

Here, the State introduced the results of the Intoxilyzer test. However, the State did not introduce evidence that the reported value was a percentage or that it was a measurement by weight of alcohol in Nasser's blood. Baran, supra, 622 N.E.2d at [572]*5721327. Although Nasser's counsel did not question the relevancy of the reported value, as did counsel in Baran, supra, such inquiry is not a requisite to Nasser's defense. It is the State's task to build its case based upon the elements of the offense charged. Having failed to do so, the evidence can not support the judgment.

The judgment of the trial court is reversed.

FRIEDLANDER, J., concurs. RUCKER, J., dissents with opinion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

630 N.E.2d 571, 1994 Ind. App. LEXIS 267, 1994 WL 81930, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nasser-v-state-indctapp-1994.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack