Nassau County Trust Co. v. Saleeby

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Nassau County Trust Co. v. Saleeby

243 A.D. 604

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 15, 1935

DocketNo. 39

StatusPublished

This text of 243 A.D. 604 (Nassau County Trust Co. v. Saleeby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nassau County Trust Co. v. Saleeby, 243 A.D. 604 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion to dispense with printing and to consolidate appeals denied. No. 40. Motion to dismiss appeal denied on condition that appellants perfect the appeal for the February term (for which term the case is set down) and be ready for argument when reached; otherwise, motion granted, with ten dollars costs. No. 65 Motion to add. appeal to January calendar denied. The appellant should perfect its appeal and be prepared to argue at the February term. It is difficult to understand the objections made by the respondents to the proposed case. The record should contain the findings and the requests to find which have been passed upon by the trial court. If there were alterations or amendments made to proposed findings by the trial court, those changes should be indicated. They may, however, be printed on a separate.sheet. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Davis and Johnston, JJ. ■

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion to dispense with printing and to consolidate appeals denied. No. 40. Motion to dismiss appeal denied on condition that appellants perfect the appeal for the February term (for which term the case is set down) and be ready for argument when reached; otherwise, motion granted, with ten dollars costs. No. 65 Motion to add. appeal to January calendar denied. The appellant should perfect its appeal and be prepared to argue at the February term. It is difficult to understand the objections made by the respondents to the proposed case. The record should contain the findings and the requests to find which have been passed upon by the trial court. If there were alterations or amendments made to proposed findings by the trial court, those changes should be indicated. They may, however, be printed on a separate.sheet. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Davis and Johnston, JJ. ■

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

243 A.D. 604, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nassau-county-trust-co-v-saleeby-nyappdiv-1935.