Nassau County Trust Co. v. Saleeby

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Nassau County Trust Co. v. Saleeby

241 A.D. 700

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Nassau County Trust Co. v. Saleeby. Read the opinion of the Court — 240 A.D. 900 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 15, 1934·Published

Opinion

Orders in so far as appeal is taken therefrom, affirmed, without costs. The purpose of the respondents’ counsel in respect to the motions and orders was quite evidently for delay and for other reasons not involving the merits of the action. His tactics as disclosed by this record are not to be commended. The practical solution, however, is for the parties to proceed to the new trial granted by this court on November 13, 1933, without further delay or without involvement in further unnecessary motions. No cross-appeal by the plaintiffs is’ presented on this record. Young, Kapper, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., concurs in result.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Orders in so far as appeal is taken therefrom, affirmed, without costs. The purpose of the respondents’ counsel in respect to the motions and orders was quite evidently for delay and for other reasons not involving the merits of the action. His tactics as disclosed by this record are not to be commended. The practical solution, however, is for the parties to proceed to the new trial granted by this court on November 13, 1933, without further delay or without involvement in further unnecessary motions. No cross-appeal by the plaintiffs is’ presented on this record. Young, Kapper, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., concurs in result.

Nassau County Trust Co. v. Saleeby, 241 A.D. 700 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

241 A.D. 700 (Nassau County Trust Co. v. Saleeby) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.