Nassar v. University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
This text of 688 F.3d 211 (Nassar v. University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND REHEARING EN BANC
(Opinion March 8, 2012, 5th Cir., 2012, 674 F.3d 448)
The Petition for Rehearing is DENIED and the court having been polled at the request of one of the members of the court and a majority of the judges who are in regular active service and not disqualified not having voted in favor, the Petition for Rehearing En Banc is also DENIED.
In the en banc poll, 6 judges voted in favor of rehearing (Jones, Jolly, Smith, Garza, Clement, and Owen), and 9 judges voted against rehearing (Davis, Stewart, Dennis, Prado, Elrod, Southwick, Haynes, Graves, and Higginson). Judge King did not participate in consideration of the rehearing en banc.
Joining in Judge Smith’s dissent are Chief Judge Jones, Judge Jolly, and Judge Clement.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
688 F.3d 211, 2012 WL 2926956, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 14838, 115 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 972, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nassar-v-university-of-texas-southwestern-medical-center-ca5-2012.