Nasiatka v. England
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1444
MICHAEL P. NASIATKA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
GORDON R. ENGLAND, Secretary, Department of the Navy,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
HANSFORD T. JOHNSON, Acting Secretary of the Navy; RICHARD J. NAUGHTON, Vice Admiral,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (CA- 03-900-RDB)
Submitted: March 29, 2006 Decided: April 10, 2006
Before WILKINSON, WILLIAMS, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael P. Nasiatka, Appellant Pro Se. Tarra Deshields Minnis, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 - PER CURIAM:
Michael P. Nasiatka appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment in favor of his employer in this
employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. See Nasiatka v. England, No. CA-03-
900-RDB (D. Md. Oct. 9, 2003; Mar. 10, 2005). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 3 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Nasiatka v. England (Nasiatka v. England) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.