Nasiatka v. England

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Nasiatka v. England. Read the opinion of the Court — 174 F. App'x 797
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 10, 2006·No. 05-1444·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-1444

MICHAEL P. NASIATKA,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

GORDON R. ENGLAND, Secretary, Department of the Navy,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

HANSFORD T. JOHNSON, Acting Secretary of the Navy; RICHARD J. NAUGHTON, Vice Admiral,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (CA- 03-900-RDB)

Submitted: March 29, 2006 Decided: April 10, 2006

Before WILKINSON, WILLIAMS, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael P. Nasiatka, Appellant Pro Se. Tarra Deshields Minnis, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

- 2 - PER CURIAM:

Michael P. Nasiatka appeals the district court’s order

granting summary judgment in favor of his employer in this

employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. See Nasiatka v. England, No. CA-03-

900-RDB (D. Md. Oct. 9, 2003; Mar. 10, 2005). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 3 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nasiatka v. England, (4th Cir. 2006).

Nasiatka v. England (Nasiatka v. England) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.