Nasiatka v. England

Fourth Circuit

Nasiatka v. England

174 F. App'x 797

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedApril 10, 2006

DocketNo. 05-1444

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 174 F. App'x 797 (Nasiatka v. England) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nasiatka v. England, 174 F. App'x 797 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Michael P. Nasiatka appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of his employer in this employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Na-siatka v. England, No. CA-03-900-RDB (D. Md. Oct. 9, 2003; Mar. 10, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Michael P. Nasiatka appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of his employer in this employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Na-siatka v. England, No. CA-03-900-RDB (D. Md. Oct. 9, 2003; Mar. 10, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

174 F. App'x 797, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nasiatka-v-england-ca4-2006.