Nasiatka v. England

Fourth Circuit

Nasiatka v. England

174 F. App'x 797

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 10, 2006·No. No. 05-1444·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Michael P. Nasiatka appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of his employer in this employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Na-siatka v. England, No. CA-03-900-RDB (D. Md. Oct. 9, 2003; Mar. 10, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Michael P. Nasiatka appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of his employer in this employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Na-siatka v. England, No. CA-03-900-RDB (D. Md. Oct. 9, 2003; Mar. 10, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Nasiatka v. England, 174 F. App'x 797 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

174 F. App'x 797 (Nasiatka v. England) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.