Nash v. State

249 S.W.3d 244, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 451, 2008 WL 850213
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 1, 2008·No. ED 89692·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Wilburn Nash appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nash v. State, 249 S.W.3d 244, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 451, 2008 WL 850213 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

249 S.W.3d 244 (Nash v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cramer v. State
249 S.W.3d 244 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)