Cramer v. State
This text of 249 S.W.3d 244 (Cramer v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Anthony Cramer appeals the judgment affirming his motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 29.15 after an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court did not clearly err in finding that the evidence did not support a defense to first degree assault of acting under the influence of sudden passion arising from adequate cause.
An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. *245 The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
249 S.W.3d 244, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 442, 2008 WL 850215, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cramer-v-state-moctapp-2008.