Naranjibhai Patel v. City of Los Angeles

708 F.3d 1075, 2013 WL 518484, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 2957
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Naranjibhai Patel v. City of Los Angeles. Read the opinion of the Court — 738 F.3d 1058
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided February 13, 2013·No. 08-56567·Published

Opinion

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Naranjibhai Patel v. City of Los Angeles, 708 F.3d 1075, 2013 WL 518484, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 2957 (9th Cir. 2013).

708 F.3d 1075 (Naranjibhai Patel v. City of Los Angeles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.