Naranjibhai Patel v. City of Los Angeles

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Naranjibhai Patel v. City of Los Angeles. Read the opinion of the Court — 738 F.3d 1058 →

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided February 13, 2013·No. 08-56567·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NARANJIBHAI PATEL; RAMILABEN No. 08-56567 PATEL, Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. 2:05-cv-01571- v. DSF-AJW

CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a municipal corporation, ORDER Defendant-Appellee.

Filed February 13, 2013

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35–3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NARANJIBHAI PATEL; RAMILABEN No. 08-56567 PATEL, Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. 2:05-cv-01571- v. DSF-AJW

CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a municipal corporation, ORDER Defendant-Appellee.

Filed February 13, 2013

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Naranjibhai Patel v. City of Los Angeles, (9th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

Naranjibhai Patel v. City of Los Angeles (Naranjibhai Patel v. City of Los Angeles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.