Naprstek v. Marriot International, Inc.

S.D. New York

Naprstek v. Marriot International, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided January 14, 2025·No. 1:21-cv-08560·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK LUBOS NAPRSTEK,

Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 21 Civ. 8560 (CM) (SLC) -v-

MARRIOT INTERNATIONAL, INC., et al., ORDER

Defendants. SARAH L. CAVE, United States Magistrate Judge. Defendants are correct that Plaintiff's purported expert disclosure (ECF No. 113) is deficient under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2). (See ECF No. 114). Because of Defendants' consent to an extension of expert discovery, in deference to Plaintiff's pro se status, (id.) the expert discovery deadlines are EXTENDED as follows: 1. Plaintiff shall submit his written expert report, which shall comply with Rule 26(a)(2), no later than February 21, 2025; 2. Any rebuttal expert report shall be submitted by March 21, 2025; 3. All expert discovery shall conclude by April 4, 2025; and 4. On or before April 11, 2025, the parties shall file a joint letter certifying the completion of expert discovery. Plaintiff is warned that failure to submit a written expert report by February 21, 2025 will likely foreclose his ability to proffer an expert in this case. See Rekor Systems, Inc. v. Loughlin, No. 19 Civ. 7767 (LJL), 2022 WL 2063857, at *8 (S.D.N.Y. June 8, 2022). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiff. Dated: New York, New York January 14, 2025 SO ORDERED.

( Ma L. La United States Magistrate Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK LUBOS NAPRSTEK,

Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 21 Civ. 8560 (CM) (SLC) -v-

MARRIOT INTERNATIONAL, INC., et al., ORDER

Defendants. SARAH L. CAVE, United States Magistrate Judge. Defendants are correct that Plaintiff's purported expert disclosure (ECF No. 113) is deficient under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2). (See ECF No. 114). Because of Defendants' consent to an extension of expert discovery, in deference to Plaintiff's pro se status, (id.) the expert discovery deadlines are EXTENDED as follows: 1. Plaintiff shall submit his written expert report, which shall comply with Rule 26(a)(2), no later than February 21, 2025; 2. Any rebuttal expert report shall be submitted by March 21, 2025; 3. All expert discovery shall conclude by April 4, 2025; and 4. On or before April 11, 2025, the parties shall file a joint letter certifying the completion of expert discovery. Plaintiff is warned that failure to submit a written expert report by February 21, 2025 will likely foreclose his ability to proffer an expert in this case. See Rekor Systems, Inc. v. Loughlin, No. 19 Civ. 7767 (LJL), 2022 WL 2063857, at *8 (S.D.N.Y. June 8, 2022). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiff. Dated: New York, New York January 14, 2025 SO ORDERED.

( Ma L. La United States Magistrate Judge

Naprstek v. Marriot International, Inc., (S.D.N.Y. 2025).

Pincite

Naprstek v. Marriot International, Inc. (Naprstek v. Marriot International, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.