Napier v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Napier v. State

724 So. 2d 190, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 459, 1999 WL 22590

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 22, 1999

DocketNo. 97-3444

StatusPublished

This text of 724 So. 2d 190 (Napier v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Napier v. State, 724 So. 2d 190, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 459, 1999 WL 22590 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this direct appeal, appellant asserts that he was erroneously assessed four legal status points on his sentencing guidelines score sheet. The state contends the error was not preserved for review, and we agree. Therefore we AFFIRM the conviction and sentence, without prejudice to appellant to file an appropriate post-conviction motion. See Tanner v. State, 724 So.2d 643 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999).

JOANOS, ALLEN and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this direct appeal, appellant asserts that he was erroneously assessed four legal status points on his sentencing guidelines score sheet. The state contends the error was not preserved for review, and we agree. Therefore we AFFIRM the conviction and sentence, without prejudice to appellant to file an appropriate post-conviction motion. See Tanner v. State, 724 So.2d 643 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999).

JOANOS, ALLEN and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

724 So. 2d 190, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 459, 1999 WL 22590, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/napier-v-state-fladistctapp-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack