Nanney v. Rbc Ministries

CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia
DecidedMarch 14, 2011
DocketCivil Action No. 2011-0315
StatusPublished

This text of Nanney v. Rbc Ministries (Nanney v. Rbc Ministries) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nanney v. Rbc Ministries, (D.D.C. 2011).

Opinion

FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MAR 14 2011 Clerk, U.S. District & Bankruptcy Courts for the District of Columbia James David Nanney, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 11-0315 (UNA) ) RBC Ministries, ) ) Defendant. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

In what the Court has construed as a motion, plaintiff, a prisoner at the Brown Creek

Correctional Institution in Polkton, North Carolina, seeks a court order to compel prison officials

to release a certified copy of his trust fund account statement so that he may comply with this

Court's Order of February 8, 2011. Because the complaint fails to provide a basis for federal

court jurisdiction, the Court will instead dismiss this action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3)

(requiring the court to dismiss an action "at any time" it determines that subject matter

jurisdiction is wanting).

The subject matter jurisdiction of the federal district courts is limited and is set forth

generally at 28 U.S.c. §§ 1331 and 1332. Under those statutes, federal jurisdiction is available

only when a "federal question" is presented or the parties are of diverse citizenship and the

amount in controversy exceeds $75,000. A party seeking relief in the district court must at least

plead facts that bring the suit within the court's jurisdiction. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a).

Plaintiff sues an entity located in Grand Rapids, Michigan, for "fraud, lieing [sic] and

robbery of a Bible." Compi. at 1. He "want [s] a federal order to take all of RBC Ministries •

proptery [sic]." Id. The complaint neither presents a federal question nor provides a basis for

diversity jurisdiction because no amount in controversy is pled. A separate Order accompanies

this Memorandum Opinion.

March ~, 2011

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Federal question
28 U.S.C. § 1331

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Nanney v. Rbc Ministries, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nanney-v-rbc-ministries-dcd-2011.