Nancy Buchanan, Mother, Next of Kin of Corwendell D. Perkins v. Hardemen County Tennessee and Hardeman County Highway Dept.
This text of Nancy Buchanan, Mother, Next of Kin of Corwendell D. Perkins v. Hardemen County Tennessee and Hardeman County Highway Dept. (Nancy Buchanan, Mother, Next of Kin of Corwendell D. Perkins v. Hardemen County Tennessee and Hardeman County Highway Dept.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE WESTERN SECTION AT JACKSON
NANCY BUCHANAN, MOTHER, ET ) From the Circuit Court AL., NEXT OF KIN OF CORWENDELL) for Hardeman County, Tennessee D. PERKINS, DECEASED ) ) Plaintiffs/Appellants, ) The Honorable Jon Kerry Blackwood, Judge vs. ) ) Hardeman County Circuit No. 8344 HARDEMAN COUNTY, TENNESSEE ) Appeal No. 02A01-9411-CV-00257 and HARDEMAN COUNTY HIGHWAY) DEPARTMENT, ) AFFIRMED ) ) Marcus M. Reaves Jackson, Tennessee, and FILED Defendants/Appellees. ) La Quetta M. Golden ) Gulfport, Mississippi October 9, 1996 ) Attorney s for Plaintiffs/Appellants ) Cecil Crowson, Jr. ) James I. Pentecost Appellate C ourt Clerk ) Jackson, Tennessee ) Attorney for Defendants/Appellees
MEMORANDUM OPINION1
This matter appears appropriate for consideration pursuant to Rule 10(b) of the Rules of the
Court of Appeals of Tennessee.
The plaintiffs/appellants in this cause, Nancy Buchanan, et al., (“Buchanan”) appeal the trial
court’s grant of summary judgment to defendants/appellees, Hardeman County, Tennessee, et al.,
(“Hardeman County”). After a serious automobile accident on Minnie Hill Road in Hardeman
County, Buchanan filed suit against Hardeman County for wrongful death, alleging that the road was
not properly maintained by the County. Buchanan alleged that the accident would not have occurred
had a lower speed limit been posted, a warning sign been erected, the curve properly delineated by
road markings, and guardrails been installed. Buchanan argues that the doctrine of sovereign
immunity does not apply to Hardeman County in this case and that the road was unsafe, dangerous,
and defective under Tenn. Code Ann. § 29-20-203(a).
1 Rule 10 (Rules of the Court of Appeals of Tennessee). -- (b) Memorandum Opinion. The Court, with the concurrence of all judges participating in the case, may affirm, reverse or modify the actions of the trial court by memorandum opinion when a formal opinion would have no precedential value. When a case is decided by memorandum opinion it shall be designated “MEMORANDUM OPINION,” shall not be published, and shall not be cited or relied on for any reason in a subsequent unrelated case. Hardeman County maintains that the decisions questioned by Buchanan, such as where to
put signs on the road, are discretionary, resulting from planning, and that the doctrine of sovereign
immunity is applicable. It also argues that there is no evidence that it had notice of the alleged
dangerous condition of the road. Finally, Hardeman County contends that it is undisputed that the
proximate cause of the accident was an unidentified oncoming vehicle that forced the Buchanan
vehicle off the road and into the water drainage ditch.
To support its summary judgment motion, Hardeman County presented the deposition
testimony of Trent Futrell, the front-seat passenger in the Buchanan vehicle and the only surviving
eyewitness to the accident. Futrell testified that an unidentified vehicle came around the curve at
night with its headlights on and that the vehicle was on the wrong side of the road. He stated that
the unidentified vehicle forced the Buchanan vehicle off the road and into the bank of the water
drainage ditch. Buchanan offered no evidence to rebut Futtrell’s testimony on the issue of causation.
Consequently, the evidence presented to the trial court is undisputed on the issue of
proximate cause, and the trial court’s grant of summary judgment is affirmed on that ground. It is
unnecessary to address the other issues presented on appeal, such as the applicability of the doctrine
of sovereign immunity.
Affirmed in accordance with Court of Appeals Rule 10(a). Costs are assessed against the
Appellants, for which execution may issue if necessary.
HOLLY KIRBY LILLARD, J.
CONCUR:
W. FRANK CRAWFORD, P.J., W.S.
ALAN E. HIGHERS, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Nancy Buchanan, Mother, Next of Kin of Corwendell D. Perkins v. Hardemen County Tennessee and Hardeman County Highway Dept., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nancy-buchanan-mother-next-of-kin-of-corwendell-d--tennctapp-1996.