Nance v. Town of Oyster Bay

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Nance v. Town of Oyster Bay

18 A.D.2d 839, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4533

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 28, 1963

StatusPublished

This text of 18 A.D.2d 839 (Nance v. Town of Oyster Bay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nance v. Town of Oyster Bay, 18 A.D.2d 839, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4533 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

In a taxpayer’s action under section 51 of the General Municipal Law, to enjoin further dredging of land under water in Cold Spring Harbor, owned by the defendant the Town of Oyster Bay; to recover damages for the materials removed; and to declare void the agreement for said dredging operation between the defendant town and the defendant United States Dredging Corporation, the said town and corporation appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered October 15, 1962 which: (1) granted plaintiff’s motion to vacate their notice to examine before trial plaintiff’s former counsel, [840]*840Milton Lipson; and (2) denied their I cross motion to examine said Lipson either as a party plaintiff or as a witness. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Beldoek, P, J., Ughetta, Brennan, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a taxpayer’s action under section 51 of the General Municipal Law, to enjoin further dredging of land under water in Cold Spring Harbor, owned by the defendant the Town of Oyster Bay; to recover damages for the materials removed; and to declare void the agreement for said dredging operation between the defendant town and the defendant United States Dredging Corporation, the said town and corporation appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered October 15, 1962 which: (1) granted plaintiff’s motion to vacate their notice to examine before trial plaintiff’s former counsel, [840]*840Milton Lipson; and (2) denied their I cross motion to examine said Lipson either as a party plaintiff or as a witness. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Beldoek, P, J., Ughetta, Brennan, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 A.D.2d 839, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4533, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nance-v-town-of-oyster-bay-nyappdiv-1963.