Nakyeoung Seoung v. Vicuna

38 A.D.3d 734, 830 N.Y.S.2d 911
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 20, 2007
StatusPublished
Cited by17 cases

This text of 38 A.D.3d 734 (Nakyeoung Seoung v. Vicuna) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nakyeoung Seoung v. Vicuna, 38 A.D.3d 734, 830 N.Y.S.2d 911 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the [735]*735plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dorsa, J.), entered June 30, 2006, which denied his motion, in effect, pursuant to CPLR 4404 (a) to set aside a jury verdict in favor of the defendants and for a new trial.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

It is the obligation of the appellant to assemble a proper record on appeal, which must include any relevant transcripts of proceedings before the Supreme Court (see CPLR 5525 [a]; 5526; Gaffney v Gaffney, 29 AD3d 857 [2006]; Fernald v Vinci, 13 AD3d 333 [2004]; Gerhardt v New York City Tr. Auth., 8 AD3d 427 [2004]; Garnerville Holding Co. v IMC Mgt., 299 AD2d 450 [2002]). Here, although the appellant seeks review of an order which denied his motion, in effect, pursuant to CPLR 4404 (a) to set aside a jury verdict in favor of the defendants, he has failed to include the full trial transcript in the record. The record is inadequate to enable this Court to render an informed decision on the merits, and thus, the appeal must be dismissed (see Gerhardt v New York City Tr. Auth., supra; Garnerville Holding Co. v IMC Mgt., supra; Whyte v Destra, 298 AD2d 384, 385 [2002]). Crane, J.P., Goldstein, Fisher and Lifson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hayashi v. Cadet
2021 NY Slip Op 01400 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
Roberts v. Roberts
2018 NY Slip Op 1949 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Frank v. Gengler
2017 NY Slip Op 4423 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
McPherson v. City of New York
122 A.D.3d 809 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Blaylock v. State
118 A.D.3d 836 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Town of Wawayanda v. O'Neil
118 A.D.3d 868 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Smith v. Imagery Media, LLC
95 A.D.3d 1204 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Kociubinski v. Kociubinski
83 A.D.3d 1006 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Kruseck v. Ross
82 A.D.3d 939 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Hazell v. State
81 A.D.3d 893 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Schwartz v. Schwartz
73 A.D.3d 1156 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Milowski v. Michael
69 A.D.3d 909 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Yu v. Fan
65 A.D.3d 1335 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Robertson v. United Equities, Inc.
61 A.D.3d 838 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Howard v. Springer
41 A.D.3d 848 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
38 A.D.3d 734, 830 N.Y.S.2d 911, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nakyeoung-seoung-v-vicuna-nyappdiv-2007.